Relative labor demand in an open economy

  • Grigoris Zarotiadis
Articles
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This paper contributes to the discussion concerning the nature of the well-documented worsening of wage and employment inequality in western economies during the past three decades. It critically discusses the use of the traditional Heckscher and Ohlin approach to analyze the distributional effects of international competition. The paper also discusses an innovative theoretical scenario in order to effectively explain the empirical observations. The model overcomes the problem of a dichotomized labor market, which is an unfavorable result of the traditional approach. Furthermore, the factor-biased character of the technological change becomes endogenous as the strength of foreign competition and the induced incentives for technical innovations are taken into consideration.

Keywords

Economic Growth Labor Market International Economic Open Economy Traditional Approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. “Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. E. “The Effect of Trade and Foreign Direct Investment on Employment and Relative Wages,” NBER Working Paper 5037, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Berman, E.; Bound, J.; Griliches, Z. “Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor Within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence From the Annual Survey of Manufactures,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Bound, J.; Johnson, G. “Changes in the Structure of Wages During the 80s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations,”American Economic Review, June, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Francois, J. F.; Nelson, D. “Trade, Technologies and Wages: General Equilibrium Mechanics,”The Economic Journal, 108, September, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. “The Origins of Technology-Skills Complementarity,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Hine, R. C.; Wright, P. W. “Trade With Low-Wage Economies, Employment, and Productivity in Manufacturing,”The Economic Journal, 108, September, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. Krugman, P.; Lawrence, R. Z. “Trade, Jobs, and Wages,” NBER Working Paper 4478, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Layard, R.; Nickell, S.; Jackman, R.Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence, R. Z.; Slaughter, M. J. “International Trade and U.S. Wages: Great Sucking or Small Hiccup,” Paper Presented at the MICRO-BPEA Meeting, Washington, D.C., June, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Machin, S.; Ryan, A.; van Reenen, J. “Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from an International Panel of Industry,” CEPR Discussion Paper 1434, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. Slaughter, M. J. “International Trade and Labour-Market Outcomes: Results, Questions, and Policy Options,”The Economic Journal, 108, September, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Wood, A.North-South Trade, Employment, & Inequality: Changing Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World, Clarendon Press-Oxford, U.K., 1994.Google Scholar
  14. __. “How Trade Hurt Unskilled Workers,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 3, Summer, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Zarotiadis, G. “Within-and Between-Industry Changes in the Relative Use of Non-Operative Workers in the Austrian, Hellenic, and British Manufacturing,” Paper Presented at the ASSET Euroconference, Rehthymno, Greece, October, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grigoris Zarotiadis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations