International Advances in Economic Research

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 304–313 | Cite as

Revealing a region's growth potential through the internal structure of the economy

  • Vangelis M. Tzouvelekas
  • Konstantinos Mattas


Analysts increasingly turn their attention to discover the hidden growth potential within the sectoral structure of a regional economy and to identify the most appropriate scientific tools for investigating sectoral development priorities. Advances in handling huge data electronically allow regional policy makers to garner a whole array of benefits spawning from an input-output analysis, as long as the use of fast-building input-output techniques will be sufficiently enlightened. In this paper, two of the most extensively used non-survey techniques, the Generation of Regional Input-Output Tables and Supply-Demand Pool Analysis, are applied to derive alternative regional impact indicators for the Mediterranean island of Crete. A comparison among several computed impact indicators demonstrates that substantial differences exist among them, although there is no evidence that the followed non-survey technique could lead to contradicted results. Also, results reveal that sequence and combination of the expansion of the sectors largely determine the region's growth pace.


Growth Potential Regional Policy Regional Impact Sectoral Structure Sectoral Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Centre of Planning and Economic Research.Regional Policy, Athens: KEPE, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Czamanski, S.; Malizia, E. E. "Applicability and Limitations in the Use of National Input-Output Tables for Regional Studies,"Regional Science Association Papers and Proceedings, 23, 1969, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
  3. Garnick, D. H. "Differential Regional Multipliers Models,"Journal of Regional Science, 10, 1, 1970, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar
  4. Greek Tourism Organisation.Greek Tourism Towards 2000, Athens: Greek Tourism Organisation, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Hewings, G. J. D. "Regional Input-Output Models Using National Data: The Structure of West Midlands Economy,"Annals of Regional Science, 3, 1, 1969, pp. 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Isard, W. "Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space-Economy,"Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 4, 1951, pp. 318–28.Google Scholar
  7. —— "Regional Commodity Balances and Interregional Commodity Flows,"American Economic Review, XLIII, 1953, pp. 167–80.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, R. C.; Mandeville, T. D.; Karunarante, N. D.Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output Analysis, London: Croom Helm, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Jensen, R. C.; Powell, R. A. "The Role of the Rural Sectors in the Economies of Queensland Regions: An Application of Input-Output Tables,"Proceedings of the Input-Output Workshop, Sydney: Fifth Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Section of Regional Science Association, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Jensen, R. C.; West, G. "The Effect of Relative Coefficient Size on Input-Output Multipliers,"Environment and Planning, A12, 1980, pp. 659–70.Google Scholar
  11. Johns, P. M.; Leat, P. M. K.An Approach to Regional Economic Modelling: The Case of Gampian, Economic Report 44, Aberdeen: North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. Karunarante, N. D.Australian Development Issues: An Input-Output Analysis, Newcastle upon Tyne: Avebury, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, M.; Radtke, B.; Eleveld, B.; Nofziger, N. D. "The Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program on Rural Communities: The Case of Three Oregon Counties,"Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11, 1988, pp. 225–232.Google Scholar
  14. Mattas, K.; Pagoulatos, A.; Debertin, D. L.Building Input-Output Models using Non-survey Techniques, Series 72, Mississippi: Southern Rural Development Centre, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Mattas, K.; Shrestha, C. M. "A New Approach to Determining Sectoral Priorities in an Economy: Input-Output Elasticities,"Applied Economics, 23, 1991, pp. 247–54.Google Scholar
  16. Miernyk, W. H.The Elements of Input-Output Analysis, New York: Random House, 1965.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, R. E.; Blair, P. D.Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Agriculture.Wholesales Price Index of Agricultural Products, Athens: Ministry of Agriculture, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Labour.Research of the Greek Labour Force, Athens: Ministry of Labour, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. Moore, F. T.; Petersen, J. W. "Regional Analysis: An Interindustry Model of Utah,"The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 4, November 1955, pp. 368–83.Google Scholar
  21. Mylonas, N. A.Analytical Input-Output Tables of the Greek Economy-Year 1980, Athens: Centre of Planning and Economic Research, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. National Statistical Service of Greece.Census in Manufacture, Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece, 1988a.Google Scholar
  23. ——.Agricultural Statistics of Greece, Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece, 1988b.Google Scholar
  24. ——.Census in Public Administration, Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece, 1988c.Google Scholar
  25. ——.Provisional National Accounts, Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Pagoulatos, A.; Mattas, K.; Debertin, D. L. "A Comparison of Some Alternatives to Input-Output Multipliers,"Land Economics, 62, 4, 1986, pp. 371–7.Google Scholar
  27. Psaltopoulos, D.; Thomson, K. J. "Input-Output Evaluation of Rural Development: A Forestry-Centred Applications,"Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 4, 1993, pp. 351–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, H.Input-Output and Regional Economics, London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1972.Google Scholar
  29. Sawyer, C. H.; Miller, R. E. "Experiments in Regionalization of a National Input-Output Table,"Environment and Planning, A15, 1983, pp. 1501–20.Google Scholar
  30. Schaffer, W. A.; Chu, K. "Non-Survey Techniques for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models,"Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 23, 1969, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
  31. Tzouvelekas, V. M.Regional Economic Modelling. An Intersectoral Analysis of the Cretan Economy, M.Sc. Dissertation, Greece: Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, 1994.Google Scholar
  32. West, G. R.; Wilkinson, J. T.; Jensen, R. C.Generation of Regional Input-Output Tables for the State and Regions of South Australia, Report to the Treasury Department, Department of Urban and Regional Affairs, Queensland: Department of Economics, University of Queensland, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vangelis M. Tzouvelekas
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Mattas
    • 2
  1. 1.University of WalesAberystwythU.K.
  2. 2.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations