Abstract
This paper hypothesizes that rational household choice with respect to abortion can be conceptualized and empirically measured by way of the relative odds ratio. If, indeed, the household behaves rationally and is endowed with perfect information, it can state its odds of choosing an abortion and will do so in a consistent and noncontradictory way. In this respect, the behavior of the household's odds ratio with respect to abortion choice should confirm Becker's hypothesis regarding cost minimization of child rearing as a tradeoff between child quality and child quantity. This study's empirical findings for a sample of U.S. households reveal odds ratios consistent with Becker's expectation that white household responses to hypothetical abortion inquiries would indicate a preference for child quality, while black responses yield odds ratios pointing to a decided preference for child quantity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, Gary S.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Blaug, Mark.The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1980, pp. 240–9.
General Social Surveys, 1972–91: Cumulative Codebook, Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, 1991.
Koutsoyiannis, A.Modern Microeconomics, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1975, pp. 28–32.
Medoff, Marshall. "An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions,"Economic Inquiry, April 1988, 26, pp. 353–9.
Rothstein, Donna S. "An Economic Approach to Abortion Demand,"The American Economicst, Spring 1992, 36, pp. 53–64.
Tribble, Romie, Jr.Principles of Cultural Economy: Equity and Wealth Distribution in Agrarian Lesotho, Ft. Collins, CO: Colorado State University, 1985, pp. 164–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tribble, R. The relative odds ratio and the theory of abortion choice. International Advances in Economic Research 2, 413–422 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295466
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295466