Abstract
The democratic political system emerging in the new South Africa is not a sufficient condition to secure a stable society. The structure and composition of intergovernmental fiscal relations will become a very important dimension of public sector reform for the future South Africa. Historically, the South African government has been highly centralized. 1994 will record the beginning of the devolution and sharing of important responsibilities to subnational governments and the planning and implementation of new decentralized arrangements. Whether the new dispensation will adhere to the general economic principles of fiscal decentralization will in the first instance depend on the principles enshrined in the new constitution. The aim of this paper is to differentiate several key drivers which reflect upon the ability of the Government of National Unity to break away from the deeply ingrained institutions of apartheid. The paper starts with some constitutional issues relative to intergovernmental fiscal relations and economic performance. Second, I provide an overview of the theory of intergovernmental fiscal relations and examine the implications for the design of an intergovernmental financial system. Third, the current structure of intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa is sketched. Fourth, I review the current output of the constitutionally established Fiscal and Finance Commission which serves as an advisory body to parliament to ensure greater transparency, efficiency, consistency, and predictability of fiscal policy. Finally, the paper concludes with some challenges ahead.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahl, R. W.; Linn, J. F.Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Bird, R. M. "Threading the Fiscal Labyrinth: Some Lessons in Fiscal Decentralization,"National Tax Journal, 46, June 1993, pp. 207–27.
Brueckner J. K. "A Test for Allocative Efficiency in the Local Public Sector,"Journal of Public Economics, 19, 1982, pp. 311–31.
Buchanan, J. M. "Federalism and Fiscal Equity,"American Economic Review, 4, 4, 1950, pp. 583–99.
Buchanan, J. M.; Tullock, G.The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1962.
Buchanan, J. M. "An Economic Theory of Clubs,"Economica, 32, 1965, pp. 1–14.
Budget Review. Department of Finance, Government Printer, RSA, March 13, 1996.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Government Printer, RSA, 1996.
Elster, Jon. "The Impact of Constitutions on Economic Performance,"Proceedings of the World Bank, Annual Conference on Development Economics 1994, World Bank, 1995.
Financial and Fiscal Commission.Recommendations for the Allocation of Financial Resources to the National and Provincial Governments for the 1997/98 Financial Year, Government Printer, RSA, 1996.
Grindle, M. S.; Thomas, J. W.Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Litvack, J. I.; Wallich, C. I. "Intergovernmental Finance: Critical to Russia's Transformation,"Development and Finance, IMF and World Bank, June 1993.
Mathews, J. M.Regional Disparities and Fiscal Equalization in Australia, Canberra, Australia: Australian National University, Center for Research on Federal Financial Relations, 1980.
MERG.Making Democracy Work: A Framework for Macroeconomic Policy in South Africa, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 1993.
McLure Jr., Charles E., ed.Tax Assignment in Federal Countries, Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press, 1983.
__ ed. "Revenue Assignment and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Russia," in E. P. Lazear, ed.,Economic Transition in Eastern Europe and Russia: Realities of Reform, Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institute Press, 1995.
Musgrave, R. A. "The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy,"Quarterly Journal of Economics, LII, 1939, pp. 213–17.
__ "Approaches to a Fiscal Theory of Political Federalism," inPublic Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press, 1961.
__ "Who Should Tax, Where, and What?," in Charles McLure, Jr., ed.,Tax Assignment in Federal Countries, Canberra, Australia: Australia National University Press, 1983.
Musgrave, R. A.; Musgrave, P. B.Public Finance in Theory and Practice, New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1984.
Oates, W. E. "The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and Tiebout Hypothesis,"Journal of Political Economy, 77, 1996, pp. 957–71.
__Fiscal Federalism, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1972.
__. "An Economist's Perspective on Fiscal Federalism," in W. Oates, ed.,The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, Lexington Books, 1977.
Samuelson, P. A. "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,"Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI, 1954, pp. 387–9.
Shah, A.The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies, Policy and Research Series, No. 23, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1991.
__. "Empirical Tests for Allocative Efficiency in the Public Sector,"Public Finance Quarterly, 20, 3, 1992, pp. 359–77.
Tiebout, C. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,"Journal of Political Economy, 64, 5, 1956, pp. 416–24.
Zucker, R. "Reciprocal Federalism: Beyond the Spending Power,"Canadian Business Economics, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, I. South African fiscal relations. International Advances in Economic Research 3, 54–70 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295001
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295001