Skip to main content
Log in

Equivalent linear logistic test models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is about the Linear Logistic Test Model (LLTM). We demonstrate that there are infinitely many equivalent ways to specify a model. An implication is that there may well be many ways to change the specification of a given LLTM and achieve the same improvement in model fit. To illustrate this phenomenon, we analyze a real data set using a Lagrange multiplier test for the specification of the model. This Lagrange multiplier test is similar to the modification index used in structural equation modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, W., & Silvey, S.D. (1958). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters subject to restraints.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 813–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini, A. (1996).Statistical inference based on the likelihood. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Heyn. S., Köller, O., & Lehrke, M. (1992).Naturwissenschaftliche und psychosoziale Bildungsprozesse im Jugendalter (BIJU)—Testdokumantation [Scientific and psychosocial developmental processes in young children]. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechger, T.M., Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.F.M. (2001). Identifiability of nonlinear logistic test models.Psychometrika, 66, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, P.A., Merckens, A., & Wansbeek, T.J. (1994).Identification, equivalent models, and computer algebra. Boston, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. (1909).Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, A. (1982). The likelihood ratio, Wald and Lagrange multiplier test: An expository note.The American Statistician, 36(3), 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butter, R.P., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N.D. (1998). An item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty.Psychometrika, 63, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1974).Einfurung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests: Grundlagen und Anwendungen [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests: Foundations and applications]. Bern, Switzerland: Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1995). The linear logistic test model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.),Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 131–155). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. (1966).The identification problem in econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, C.A.W., & Verhelst, N.D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.),Rasch models: Their foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 69–95). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S.B., Marquis, J.G., Hersberger, S.L., Thompson, M.S., & McCollam, K.M. (1999). The overparameterized analysis of variance Model.Psychological Methods, 4, 214–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, S. (1987).Linear algebra (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luijben, T.C.W. (1989).Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sociometric Research Foundation, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luijben, T.C.W. (1991). Equivalent models in covariance structure analysis.Psychometrika, 56, 653–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1955). A generalized inverse for matrices.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 62, 673–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R.M., & Rayner, A.A. (1971).Generalized inverse matrices with applications to Statistics. London, U.K.: Charles Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1947). Large sample tests of statistical hypothesis concerning several parameters with applications to the problems of estimation.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 44, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1996).Testtheory, Testkonstruction [Test theory, test construction]. Bern, Germany: Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C.C. Glogg (Ed.),Sociological Methodology 1987 (pp. 105–129). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (1983).On local identifiability in structural models. Unpublished research report, University of South Africa, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics.

  • Silvey, S.D. (1959). The Lagrange multiplier test.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification.Psychometrika, 54, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.). (1985).Human abilities: An information-processing approach. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, R.-C. (2000). Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?Psychometrika, 65, 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N.D. (1993).On the standard errors of parameter estimators in the Rasch model. (Measurement and Research department Reports, 93-1). Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volodin, N.A., & Adams, R.J. (1995, April).Identifying and estimating a D-dimensional item response model. Paper presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, University of California, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S.E., & Schneider, L.M. (1981). Information structure of geometric analogies: A test theoretic approach.Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo M. Bechger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechger, T.M., Verstralen, H.H.F.M. & Verhelst, N.D. Equivalent linear logistic test models. Psychometrika 67, 123–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294712

Key words

Navigation