Advertisement

Psychometrika

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 351–355 | Cite as

On the base-free measure of change proposed by Tucker, Damarin and Messick

  • Lloyd Bond
Notes And Comments

Abstract

Tucker, Damarin and Messick proposed a “base-free” measure of change which involves the computation of residual scores that are uncorrelated with true scores on the pretest. The present note discusses this change measure and demonstrates that, because of an incorrect derivation by the authors, properties they attribute toα (the coefficient for the regression of true scores from the second testing on true scores from the first testing) are, in fact, properties ofb, the ordinary regression coefficient. A correct derivation of the initial position—change correlation in terms ofα is obtained, and Tucker et al.'s discussion of the “law of initial values” is reconsidered.

Key words

base-free measure of change difference scores measuring change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. How we should measure “change”—or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 68–80.Google Scholar
  2. Harris, C. W. (Ed.)Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. Lacey, J. I. & Lacey, B. C. The law of initial value in the longitudinal study of autonomic constitution: Reproducibility of autonomic responses and response patterns over a four year interval. In W. M. Wolf (Ed.), Rhythmic functions in the living system.Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1962,28, 1257–1290.Google Scholar
  4. Lord, F. M. The measurement of growth.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956,16, 421–437.Google Scholar
  5. Lord, F. M. Further problems in the measurement of growth.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1958,18, 437–451.Google Scholar
  6. Manning, W. H. & Dubois, P. H. Correlational methods in research on human learning.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962,15, 287–321.Google Scholar
  7. McNemar, Q. On growth measurement.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1958,18, 47–55.Google Scholar
  8. O'Connor, E. F., Jr. Extending classical test theory to the measurement of change.Review of Educational Research, 1972,42, 73–97.Google Scholar
  9. O'Connor, E. F., Jr. Response to Cronbach and Furby's “How we should measure ‘change’—or should we?”Psychological Bulletin, 1972,78, 159–160.Google Scholar
  10. Richards, J. M., Jr. A simulation study comparing procedures for assessing individual educational growth.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 603–612.Google Scholar
  11. Richards, J. M., Jr. A simulation study of the use of change measures to compare educational programs.American Educational Research Journal, 1975,12, 299–311.Google Scholar
  12. Thomson, G. H. A formula to correct for the effect of errors of measurement on the correlation of initial values with gains.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924,7, 321–324.Google Scholar
  13. Thomson, G. H. An alternative formula for the true correlation of initial values with gains.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1925,8, 323–324.Google Scholar
  14. Tucker, L. R., Damarin, F., & Messick, S. A base-free measure of change.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 457–473.Google Scholar
  15. Zieve, L. Note on the correlation of initial scores with gains.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1940,31, 391–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd Bond
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations