Abstract
This paper discusses the compatibility of some response time (RT) models with psychometric and with information processing approaches to response times. First, three psychometrically desirable properties of probabilistic models for binary data, related to the principle of specific objectivity, are adapted to the domain of RT models. One of these is the separability of item and subject parameters, and another is double monotonicity. Next, the compatibility of these psychometric properties with one very popular information processing approach, the serial-additive model, is discussed. Finally, five RT models are analyzed with respect to their compatibility with the psychometric properties, with serial-additive processing and with some alternative types of processing. It is concluded that (a) current psychometric models each satisfy one or more of the psychometric properties, but are not (easily) compatible with serial-additive processing, (b) at least one serial-additive processing model satisfies separability of item and subject parameters, and (c) RT models will more easily satisfy double monotonicity than the other two psychometric properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G. (1982). Testing the assumptions of exponential additive reaction-time models.Memory and Cognition, 10, 125–134.
Bloxom, B. (1985). Considerations in psychometric modeling of response time.Psychometrika, 50, 383–397.
Cramér, H. (1945).Mathematical methods of statistics. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksells. (Reprinted by Princeton University Press, 1974)
Crow, E. L., & Shimizu, K. (1988).Lognormal distributions: Theory and applications. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Dijkstra, A. F. (1990).Cross-modal contacts between graphemes and phonemes: Explorations in bimodal processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fischer, G. H. (1974).Einführung in die theorie psychologischer tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Bern: Huber.
Fischer, G. H. (1987). Applying the principle of specific objectivity and of generalizability to the measurement of change.Psychometrika, 52, 565–587.
Fischer, G. H., & Kisser, R. (1983). Notes on the exponential latency model and an empirical application. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.),Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 139–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review, 75, 395–373.
Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382–386.
Irtel, H. (1987). On specific objectivity as a concept in measurement. In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.),Progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 35–45). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Irtel, H. (1993). The uniqueness structure of simple latent trait models. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.),Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 265–275). New York: Springer.
Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. (1977).The Advanced theory of statistics, Vol. I (4th ed.). London: Griffin.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maris, E. (1993). Additive and multiplicative models for gamma distributed random variables, and their application as psychometric models for response times.Psychometrika, 58, 445–469.
Marley, A. A. J. (1989). A random utility family that includes many of the classical models and has closed form choice probabilities and choice reaction times.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 13–36.
McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. I (pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.
McGill, W. J., & Gibbon, J. (1965). The general Gamma distribution and reaction times.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 1–18.
Micko, H. C. (1969). A psychological scale for reaction time measurement.Acta Psychologica, 30, 324–335.
Micko, H. C. (1970). Eine Verallgemeinerung des Meßmodells von Rasch mit einer Anwendung auf die Psychophysik der Reaktionen (A generalization of Rasch's measurement model with an application to the psychophysics of reactions).Psychologische Beiträge, 12, 4–22.
Molenaar, I. W. (1982). Steviger meten met een latent model. InMarktonderzoek en Consumentengedrag. Jaarboek van de Nederlandse vereniging van marktonderzoekers 1982 (pp. 217–231) Amsterdam: Nederlandse Vereniging van Markt Onderzoekers. (Dutch Society of Market Researchers).
Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses.Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417–430.
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974).Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. (Reprinted by the University of Chicago Press, 1980)
Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity. An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. In M. Blegvad (ed.),The Danish yearbook of philosophy, Vol. 14 (pp. 58–94). Copenhagen: Muynksgaard.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
Roskam, E. E. Ch. I., & Jansen, P. G. W. (1984). A new derivation of the Rasch model. In E. Degreef & J. Van Buggenhout (Eds.),Trends in mathematical psychology (pp. 293–307). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Scheiblechner, H. (1979). Specifically objective stochastic latency mechanisms.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 18–38.
Scheiblechner, H. (1985). Psychometric models for speed-test construction: The linear exponential model. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.),Test design, developments in psychology and psychometrics (pp. 219–244). London: Academic Press.
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (1987). Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory.Psychometrika, 52, 79–97.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.
Sternberg, S. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory.Science, 153, 652–654.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method.Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: An approach using item response theory. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.),New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 179–203). New York: Academic Press.
Thorin, O. (1977). On the infinite divisibility of the lognormal distribution.Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 3, 121–148.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference.Psychological Bulletin, 108, 551–567.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983).The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: University Press.
Townsend, J. T., & Schweickert, R. (1989). Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: Laying the foundations of stochastic mental networks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 309–327.
Tutz, G. (1989).Latent Trait Modelle für ordinale Beobachtungen [Latent trait models for ordinal observations]. Berlin: Springer.
Vorberg, D., & Ulrich, R. (1987). Random search with unequal search rates: Serial and parallel generalizations of McGill's model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 31, 1–23.
Vorberg, D., & Schwarz, W. (1990). Rasch-representable reaction time distributions.Psychometrika, 55, 617–632.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. Psychometric and information processing properties of selected response time models. Psychometrika 60, 95–113 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294431
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294431