Psychometrika

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 207–215 | Cite as

The choice of constraints in correspondence analysis

  • Harvey Goldstein
Article

Abstract

A discussion of alternative constraint systems has been lacking in the literature on correspondence analysis and related techniques. This paper reiterates earlier results that an explicit choice of constraints has to be made which can have important effects on the resulting scores. The paper also presents new results on dealing with missing data and probabilistic category assignment.

Key words

constraint systems correspondence analysis dual scaling missing data optimal scaling probabilistic category assignment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Leeuw, J. (1984). The GIFI system of nonlinear multivariate analysis. In E. Diday, et al. (Eds.),Data analysis and informatics IV (pp. 415–424). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Demirjian, A., & Goldstein, H. (1976). New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth.Annals of Human Biology, 3, 411–421.Google Scholar
  3. Greenacre, M. J. (1984).Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Healy, M. J. R., & Goldstein, H. (1976). An approach to the scaling of categorised attributes.Biometrika, 63, 219–229.Google Scholar
  5. McDonald, R. P. (1983). Alternative weights and invariant parameters in optimal scaling.Psychometrika, 48, 377–392.Google Scholar
  6. McDonald, R. P., & Goldstein, H. (In preparation). Comparative properties of alternative constraint systems in optimal scaling.Google Scholar
  7. Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  8. Tenenhaus, M., & Young, F. W. (1985). An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data.Psychometrika, 50, 91–119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey Goldstein
    • 1
  1. 1.University of London Institute of EducationUSA

Personalised recommendations