Psychometrika

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 349–359 | Cite as

Items bundles

  • Paul R. Rosenbaum
Article

Abstract

An item bundle is a small group of multiple choice items that share a common reading passage or graph, or a small group of matching items that share distractors. Item bundles are easily identified by paging through a copy of a test. Bundled items may violate the latent conditional independence assumption of unidimensional item response theory (IRT), but such a violation would not typically suggest the existence of a new fundamental human ability to read one specific reading passage or to interpret one specific graph. It is important, therefore, to have theoretical concepts and empirical checks that distinguish between, on the one hand, anticipated violations of latent conditional independence within item bundles, and, on the other hand, violations that cannot be attributed to idiosyncratic features of test format and instead suggest departures from unidimensionalty. To this end, two theorems on unidimensional IRT are extended to describe observable item response distributions when there is conditional independencebetween but not necessarilywithin item bundles.

Key words

item response theory latent variable models associated random variables conditional association stochastic partial order 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bock, D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model forn dichotomously scored items.Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.Google Scholar
  2. Dawid, A. P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 1–31.Google Scholar
  3. Esary, J., Proschan, F., & Walkup, D. (1967). Association of random variables, with applications.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1466–1474.Google Scholar
  4. Holland, P. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data?Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.Google Scholar
  5. Holland, P., & Rosenbaum, P. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models.Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.Google Scholar
  6. Kamae, T., Krengel, U., & O'Brien, G. (1977). Stochastic inequalities on partially ordered spaces.Annals of Probability, 5, 899–912.Google Scholar
  7. Lord, F. (1977). A study of item bias, using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Poortings (Ed.),Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 19–29). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  8. Lord, F. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Lord, F., & Novick, M. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, R. (1981).Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Spring-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Neilson and Lydiche. (English translation, 1980, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  12. Rosenbaum, P. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory.Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenbaum, P. (1985). Comparing distributions of item responses for two groups.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 206–215.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenbaum, P. (1987). Model-based direct adjustment.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 387–394.Google Scholar
  15. Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Information processing and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul R. Rosenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Statistics, The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations