Psychometrika

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 37–47 | Cite as

Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models

  • David Rindskopf
Article

Abstract

The most widely-used computer programs for structural equation models analysis are the LISREL series of Jöreskog and Sörbom. The only types of constraints which may be made directly are fixing parameters at a constant value and constraining parameters to be equal. Rindskopf (1983) showed how these simple properties could be used to represent models with more complicated constraints, namely inequality constraints on unique variances. In this paper, two new concepts are introduced which enable a much wider variety of constraints to be made. The concepts, “phantom” and “imaginary” latent variables, allow fairly general equality and inequality constraints on factor loadings and structural model coefficients.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. Rindskopf, D. (1982).Parameterizing equality constraints in factor analysis and structural modeling. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

References

  1. Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 3–25.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S. Y. (1983). Structural models with polynomial constraints.Applied Psychological Measurement, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables.Psychometrika, 45, 289–308.Google Scholar
  4. Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). Structural equation models in the social sciences: Specification, estimation and testing. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Applications of statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  5. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1978).LISREL IV: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar
  6. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1981).LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. (Research Report 81–8) Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics, November.Google Scholar
  7. Lee, S. Y. (1980). Estimation of covariance structure models with parameters subject to functional restraints.Psychometrika, 45, 309–324.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, S. Y., & Tsui, K.-L. (1982). Covariance structure analysis in several populations.Psychometrika, 47, 297–308.Google Scholar
  9. McDonald, R. P. (1978). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 59–72.Google Scholar
  10. McDonald, R. P. (1980). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applications.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 161–183.Google Scholar
  11. Rindskopf, D. (1983). Parameterizing inequality constraints on unique variances in linear structural models.Psychometrika, 48, 73–83.Google Scholar
  12. Wismer, D. A., & Chattergy, R. (1978).Introduction to nonlinear optimization. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Rindskopf
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate CenterNew York

Personalised recommendations