Abstract
We investigate under what conditions the matrix of factor loadings from the factor analysis model with equal unique variances will give a good approximation to the matrix of factor loadings from the regular factor analysis model. We show that the two models will give similar matrices of factor loadings if Schneeweiss' condition, that the difference between the largest and the smallest value of unique variances is small relative to the sizes of the column sums of squared factor loadings, holds. Furthermore, we generalize our results and discus the conditions under which the matrix of factor loadings from the regular factor analysis model will be well approximated by the matrix of factor loadings from Jöreskog's image factor analysis model. Especially, we discuss Guttman's condition (i.e., the number of variables increases without limit) for the two models to agree, in relation with the condition we have shown, and conclude that Schneeweiss' condition is a generalization of Guttman's condition. Some implications for practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T. W. (1984). Estimating linear statistical relationships.The Annals of Statistics, 12, 1–45.
Bentler, P. M. (1995).EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67–74.
Guttman, L. (1955). The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 8, 65–81.
Guttman, L. (1956). Best possible systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 21, 273–285.
Harris, C. W. (1962). Some Rao-Guttman relationships.Psychometrika, 27, 247–263.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1963).Statistical estimation in factor analysis. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). Efficient estimation in image factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 51–75.
Kaiser, H. F. (1990, October).Outline of EPIC, a new method for factoring a reduced correlation matrix. Paper presented at Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Providence, RI.
Lawley, D. N. (1953). A modified method of estimation in factor analysis and some large sample results. In Uppsala symposium on psychological factor analysis, 17–19 March 1953.Nordisk Psykologi's Monograph Series No.3. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1988).Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. New York, Wiley.
Muirhead, R. J. (1982).Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. New York: Wiley.
Ramsay, J. O., ten Berge, J. M. F., & Styan, G. P. H. (1984). Matrix correlation.Psychometrika, 49, 403–423.
Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified treatment.Psychometrika, 54, 131–151.
Schneeweiss, H. (1997). Factors and principal components in the near spherical case.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 375–401.
Schneeweiss, H., & Mathes, H. (1995). Factor analysis and principal components.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55, 105–124.
Schott, J. R. (1997).Matrix analysis for statistics. New York: Wiley.
Uhlig, H. (1994). On singular Wishart and singular multivariate beta distributions.The Annals of Statistics, 22, 395–405.
Velicer, W., & Jackson, D. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.
Whittle, P. (1952). On principal components and least square methods of factor analysis.Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 35, 223–239.
Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1997). Improving parameter tests in covariance structure analysis.Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 26, 177–198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Kentaro Hayashi is a visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Bucknell University, Lewisburg PA 17837, and Peter M. Bentler is Professor, Departments of Psychology and Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles CA 90095-1563. (Emails: Khayashi@bucknell.edu, bentler@ucla.edu) Parts of this paper were discussed in a session on Factor Analysis (J. ten Berge, Chair) at the IFCS-98 International Conference, Rome, July, 1998. This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant DA 01070. The authors thank Professors Hans Schneeweiss and Ke-Hai Yuan, and four anonymous referees, for their invaluable comments which led to an improved version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayashi, K., Bentler, P.M. On the relations among regular, equal unique variances, and image factor analysis models. Psychometrika 65, 59–72 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294186
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294186