Abstract
A multiple-answer multiple-choice test item has a certain number of alternatives,any number of which might be keyed. The examinee is also allowed to mark any number of alternatives. This increased flexibility over the one keyed alternative case is useful in practice but raises questions about appropriate scoring rules. In this article a certain class of item scoring rules called thebinary class is considered. The concepts ofstandard scoring rules and equivalence among these scoring rules are introduced in the “misinformation” model for which the traditional “knowledge” model is a special case. The examinee's strategy with respect to a scoring rule is examined. The critical role of a quantity called the scoring ratio is emphasized. In the case of examinee uncertainty about the number of correct alternatives on an item, a Bayes and a minimax strategy for the examinee are developed. Also an appropriate response for the examiner to the minimax strategy is outlined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boas, R. P., Jr. A primer of real functions.Carus Mathematical Monographs, 1960,13.
Collet, L. S. Elimination scoring: An empirical evaluation.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 209–214.
Coombs, C. H. On the use of objective examinations.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1953,13, 308–10.
Coombs, C. H., Milholland, J. E. & Womer, J. F. B. The assessment of partial knowledge.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956,16, 13–37.
Cronbach, L. J. An experimental comparison of the multiple true-false and multiple multiple-choice tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1941,32, 533–543.
Cronbach, L. J. Note on the multiple true-false test exercise.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939,30, 628–631.
Cureton, E. E. The correction for guessing.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1966,34, 44–47.
Dressel, P. L. & Schmid, J. Some modifications of the multiple-choice item.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1953,13, 574–595.
Duncan, G. T. An empirical Bayes approach to scoring multiple-choice tests in the misinformation model.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974,69, 50–57.
Ebel, R. L.Measuring educational achievement. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965.
Haven, S. E. & Copeland, H. A. A note on the “multiple-choice” test.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1932,26, 219–221.
Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
Orleans, J. S. & Sealy, G. A.Objective tests. Yonkers, New York: World Book Company, 1928.
Scheidemann, N. V. Multiplying the possibilities of the multiple-choice form of objective question.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1933,27, 337–340.
Shuford, E. H., Albert, A. & Massengill, H. Admissible probability measurement procedures.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 125–145.
Weitzman, R. A. Ideal multiple-choice items.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970,65, 71–89.
Zinger, A. A note on multiple-choice items.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1972,65, 340–1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research partially supported under Grants N00014-67-A-0314-0022 from the Office of Naval Research and GS-32514 and MPS 75-07539 from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duncan, G.T., Milton, E.O. Multiple-answer multiple-choice test items: Responding and scoring through bayes and minimax strategies. Psychometrika 43, 43–57 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294088
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294088