Abstract
A chain of lower-bound inequalities leading to the greatest lower bound to reliability is established for the internal consistency of a composite of unit-weighted components. The chain includes the maximum split-half coefficient, the lowest coefficient consistent with nonimaginary common factors, and the lowest coefficient consistent with nonimaginary common and unique factors. Optimization theory is utilized to determine the conditions that are requisite for the inequalities. Convergence proofs demonstrate that the coefficients can be attained. Rapid algorithms obtain estimates of the coefficients with sample data. The theory yields methods for splitting items into maximally similar sets and for exploratory factor analysis based on a theoretical solution to the communality problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Bentler, P. M. & Woodward, J. A.Inequalities among lower bounds to reliability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Chapel Hill, June, 1977.
Della Riccia, G. & Shapiro, L.Minimum rank and minimum trace of correlation matrices. Department of Mathematics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel, 1979.
Rozeboom, W. W. Personal communication, March, 1979.
Bentler, P. M.Fast, legitimate, rank-independent factor analytic procedures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Fort Worth, October, 1972.
References
Bentler, P. M. A lower-bound method for the dimension-free measurement of internal consistency.Social Science Research, 1972,1, 343–357.
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 297–334.
Garey, M. R. & Johnson, D. S.Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. San Francisco: Freeman, 1979.
Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 255–282.
Harman, H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1976.
Jackson, D. N. Reliability of the Jackson Personality Inventory.Psychological Reports, 1977,40, 613–614.
Jackson, P. H. A note on the relation between coefficient alpha and Guttman's “split-half” lower bounds.Psychometrika, 1979,44, 251–252.
Jackson, P. H. & Agunwamba, C. C. Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 567–578.
Jöreskog, K. G. Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In R. C. Atkinson, D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, Vol. II. San Francisco: Freeman, 1974, pp. 1–56.
Lord, F. M. A study of speed factors in tests and academic grades.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 31–50.
Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
Warner, W. L., Meeker, M. & Eels, K.Social class in America. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
Woodhouse, B. & Jackson, P. H. Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: II: A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 579–591.
Woodward, J. A. & Bentler, P. M. A statistical lower bound to population reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 1323–1326.
Woodward, J. A. & Bentler, P. M. Application of optimal sign vectors to reliability and cluster analysis.Psychometrika, 1979,44, 337–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported in part by a Research Scientist Development Award (K02-DA00017) and a research grant (DA01070) from the U.S. Public Health Service. The manuscript profited substantially from the critiques of several anonymous reviewers, whose assistance is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentler, P.M., Woodward, J.A. Inequalities among lower bounds to reliability: With applications to test construction and factor analysis. Psychometrika 45, 249–267 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294079
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294079