Abstract
In general, nonlinear models such as those commonly employed for the analysis of covariance structures, are not globally identifiable. Any investigation of local identifiability must either yield a mapping of identifiability onto the entire parameter space, which will rarely be feasible in any applications of interest, or confine itself to the neighbourhood of such points of special interest as the maximum likelihood point.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentler, P. M. & Weeks, D. G. Linear structural equations with latent variables.Psychometrika, 1980,45, 289–308.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D.LISREL IV users' guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1978.
McDonald, R. P. & Krane, W. R. A note on local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1977,30, 198–203.
McDonald, R. P. & Krane, W. R. A Monte Carlo study of local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1979,32, 121–132.
Wald, A. Note on the identification of economic relations. In T. C. Koopmans. (Ed.),Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models. Cowles Commission Monograph, 1950, No. 10. New York: Wiley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author would like to thank J. Jack McArdle and Colin Fraser for their comments on this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, R.P. A note on the investigation of local and global identifiability. Psychometrika 47, 101–103 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293855
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293855