Advertisement

Psychometrika

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 473–476 | Cite as

A note on the use of directional statistics in weighted euclidean distances multidimensional scaling models

  • Charles L. Jones
Notes And Comments

Abstract

The weighted euclidean distances model in multidimensional scaling (WMDS) represents individual differences as dimension saliences which can be interpreted as the orientations of vectors in a subject space. It has recently been suggested that the statistics of directions would be appropriate for carrying out tests of location with such data. The nature of the directional representation in WMDS is reviewed and it is argued that since dimension saliences are almost always positive, the directional representations will usually be confined to the positive orthant. Conventional statistical techniques are appropriate to angular representations of the individual differences which will yield angles in the interval (0, 90) so long as dimension saliences are nonnegative, a restriction which can be imposed. Ordinary statistical methods are also appropriate with several linear indices which can be derived from WMDS results. Directional statistics may be applied more fruitfully to vector representations of preferences.

Key words

multidimensional scaling directional data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. Bloxom, B. Individual differences in multidimensional scaling.Research Bulletin 68-45. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Young, F. W. & R. Lewyckyj. ALSCAL-4 User's Guide. 2nd edition. Psychometric Laboratory. University of North Carolina: Chapel Hill, NC 27514. 1979.Google Scholar
  3. Young, F. W. Enhancements in ALSCAL-82. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual SAS Users Group, Cary, NC: The SAS Institute. 1982, pp. 633–642.Google Scholar

References

  1. Batschelet, E., Contribution to the discussion of a paper by K. V. Mardia.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1975,37, 378.Google Scholar
  2. Batschelet, E.,Circular statistics in biology. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J., Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via anN-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 238–319.Google Scholar
  4. Coxon, A. P. M. & Jones, C. L., Occupational similarities: subjective aspects of social stratification.Quality and Quantity, 1974,8, 139–157.Google Scholar
  5. Coxon, A. P. M. & Jones, C. L.The images of occupational prestige. London: Macmillan, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Coxon, A. P. M. & Jones, C. L.,Measurement and meanings. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Coxon, A. P. M. & Jones, C. L. Multidimensional scaling: exploration to confirmation.Quality and Quantity, 1980,14(1), 31–73.Google Scholar
  8. Horan, C. B. Multidimensional scaling: combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures.Psychometrika, 1969,34, 139–165.Google Scholar
  9. Hubert, L. J., Golledge, R. G., & Costanzo, C. M. Analysis of variance procedures based on a proximity measure between subjects.Psychological Bulletin, 1982,91, (2), 424–430.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, C. L. Analysis of preferences as directional data.Quality and Quantity (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Mardia, K. V.Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. McCallum, R. C. Effects of conditionality on INDSCAL and ALSCAL weights.Psychometrika, 197742, (2), 297–305.Google Scholar
  13. Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. A. & Young, F. W.Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. Watson, G. S., & Williams, E. J. On the construction of significance tests on the circle and the sphere.Biometrika, 1956,43, 344–352.Google Scholar
  15. Wheeler, S. & Watson, G. S. A distribution-free two sample test on a circle.Biometrika, 1964,51, 256–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles L. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.McMaster University and University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations