Skip to main content
Log in

Large employers' selection criteria in purchasing behavioral health benefits

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the criteria other than cost large employers use in selecting and monitoring behavioral health benefits, this study interviewed 31 of 44 (70.4%) randomly selected corporations employing at least 5,000 workers. While more than 60% of employers considered administrative efficiency and provider access to be very influential in their selection of behavioral health benefits, only 12.9% (95% confidence interval 0.7%–25.1%) considered clinical outcomes. Employers who considered clinical outcomes in their purchasing decision reported significantly greater satisfaction with the quality and cost of their behavioral health benefits. Following selection, 38.7% of corporations used employee complaints to monitor quality problems in their behavioral health benefits; 3.2% used clinical outcomes. If society expects employers to purchase behavioral health care on the basis of quality as well as cost, more employers need better indicators of quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Findlay S: Managed behavioral health care in 1999: An industry at a crossroads.Health Affairs 1999;18(5):116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grazier KL, Eselius LL, Hu T, et al.: Effects of a mental health carve-out on use, costs, and payers: A four-year study.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1999; 26(4):381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cuffel BJ, Goldman W, Schlesinger H: Does managing behavioral health care services increase the cost of providing medical care?Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1999; 26(4):372–380.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zarin DA, West JC, Pincus HA, et al.: Characteristics of health plans that treat psychiatric patients.Health Affairs 1999; 18(5):226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buck JA, Umland B: Covering mental health and substance abuse services.Health Affairs 1997; 16(4):120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang M, Rost KM, Fortney JC, et al.: A community study of depression treatment and employment earnings.Psychiatric Services 1999; 50(9):1209–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mynors-Wallis L, Davies I, Gray A, et al.: A randomised controlled trial and cost analysis of problem-solving treatment for emotional disorders given by community nurses in primary care.British Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 170:113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mintz J, Mintz LI, Arruda MJ, et al.: Treatments of depression and the functional capacity to work.Archives of General Psychiatry 1992; 49:761–768.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ, Legnini MW, et al.: Choosing a health plan: Do large employers use the data?Health Affairs 1997; 16(6):172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bilbrey J, Bilbrey P: Judging, trusting, and utilizing outcomes data: A survey of behavioral healthcare payors.Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow 1995; 4:62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cantor JC, Barrand NL, Desonia RA, et al.: Business leaders' views on American health care.Health Affairs 1991; 10:98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hurley RE, Thompson JM: Schmoozing with the enemy: Conversations with employee benefits managers.Hospital and Health Services Administration 1993; 38(1):197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marquis MS, Long SH: Trends in managed care and managed competition, 1993–1997.Health Affairs 1999; 18(6):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merrick EL, Garnick DW, Horgan CM, et al.: Use of performance standards in behavioral health carve-out contracts among Fortune 500 firms.American Journal of Managed Care (Special Issue) 1999; 5:81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lo Sasso AT, Perloff L, Schield J, et al.: Beyond costs: “Responsible purchasing” of managed care by employers.Health Affairs 1999; 18(6):212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WWW U.S. Census Bureau: Table 2. U.S. company statistics by employment size: 1992. http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/sb001.html (10 Nov. 1999). 1992.

  17. Meyer J, Rybowski L, Eichler R:Theory and Reality of Value-Based Purchasing: Lessons from the Pioneers. AHCPR Pub. No. 98-0004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deloitte, Touche LLP: Employer survey on managed care.Medical Benefits 1997; 15(10):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Washington Business Group on Health:Partnership or One-Time Purchase: Third Annual Survey Report on Purchasing Value in Health Care. Bethesda, MD: Watson Wyatt Worldwide, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marquis MS, Long SH: Who helps employers design their health insurance benefits?Health Affairs 2000; 19(1):133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Committee for Quality Assurance:The State of Managed Care Quality—1999. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WWW Foundation for Accountability: Measuring quality. Http://www.facct.org/measures.html, accessed February 23, 2000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Rost Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rost, K., Smith, J. & Fortney, J. Large employers' selection criteria in purchasing behavioral health benefits. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 27, 334–338 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291744

Keywords

Navigation