Psychometrika

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 137–152 | Cite as

Descriptive axioms for common factor theory, image theory and component theory

  • Roderick P. McDonald
Article

Abstract

Through an extension of work by Guttman, common factor theory, image theory, and component theory are derived from distinct minimum subsets of assumptions chosen out of a set of five possible assumptions. It is thence shown that the problem of indeterminacy of factor scores in the common factor model is precisely reflected in the problem of the non-orthogonality of anti-images. Indeed, image scores are determinate for the same reason that the usual estimates of factor scores are determinate, and image scores cannot be used as though they were factor scores for the same reason that factor score estimates cannot be used as though they were factor scores.

Keywords

Public Policy Statistical Theory Common Factor Factor Model Factor Score 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartlett, M. S. The statistical conception of mental factors.British Journal of Psychology, 1937,28, 97–104.Google Scholar
  2. Guttman, L. Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 75–99.Google Scholar
  3. Guttman, L. General theory and methods for matric factoring.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–161.Google Scholar
  5. Guttman, L. The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955,8, 65–82.Google Scholar
  6. Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–285.Google Scholar
  7. Guttman, L. A necessary and sufficient formula for matric factoring.Psychometrika, 1957a,22, 79–82.Google Scholar
  8. Guttman, L. Simple proofs of relations between the communality problem and multiple correlation.Psychometrika, 1957b,22, 147–158.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 247–264.Google Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K. G. On the statistical treatment of residuals in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 335–354.Google Scholar
  11. Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 443–482.Google Scholar
  12. Jöreskog, K. G. Efficient estimation in image factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1969,34, 51–75.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiser, H. F. A second generation little jiffy.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 401–415.Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser, H. F. and Rice, J. Little Jiffy, Mark IV.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974,34, 111–117.Google Scholar
  15. McDonald, R. P. The measurement of factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 203–222.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, R. P., and Swaminathan, H. A simple matrix calculus with applications to multivariate analysis.General Systems, 1973,18, 37–54.Google Scholar
  17. Mulaik, S. A.The foundations of factor analysis. McGraw-Hill: N. Y., 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Rao, G. R., and Mitra, S. J.Generalized inverse of matrices and its applications. Wiley: N. Y., 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Roff, M. Some properties of the communality in multiple factor theory.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick P. McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationCanada

Personalised recommendations