Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Various models for sets of congeneric tests are considered, including models appropriate for the analysis of multitrait-multimethod data. All models are illustrated with real data. The special cases when two or more tests within a set are tau-equivalent or parallel are also considered. All data analyses are done within the framework of a general model by Jöreskog [1970].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959,56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, N., Jensen, O., & Beaton, A. E. Organizational climates and administrative performance. Research Bulletin 68-41. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 443–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1969,34, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. A general method for analysis of covariance structures.Biometrika, 1970,57, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., Gruvaeus, G. T., & van Thillo, M. ACOVS—A general computer program for analysis of covariance structures. Research Bulletin 70-15. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, E. L., & Fiske, D. W.The prediction of performance in clinical psychology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. Statistical inferences about the error variance.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. Estimation of true score and error variance for tests under various equivalence assumptions.Psychometrika, 1969,34, 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. A study of speed factors in tests and academic grades.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. A significance test for the hypothesis that two variables measure the same trait except for errors of measurement.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores (with contributions by A. Birnbaum). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. Attenuation and interaction.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Votaw, D. F., Jr. Testing compound symmetry in a normal multivariate distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1948,19, 447–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. S. Sample criteria for testing equality of means, equality of variances, and equality of covariances in a normal multivariate distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1946,17, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Additional information

Research reported in this paper has been supported by Grant NSF-GB-12959 from National Science Foundation. The writer wishes to thank Gunnar Gruvaeus and Marielle van Thillo, who wrote the computer program and assisted in all aspects of the computational work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jöreskog, K.G. Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika 36, 109–133 (1971).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: