Psychometrika

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Subjective geographic distance: A multidimensional comparison

  • Ulf Lundberg
  • Gösta Ekman
Article

Abstract

The interdistances between thirteen places situated in different parts of the world were estimated by 60 subjects. The estimates were analysed by Kruskal's multidimensional technique and, after a cosine transformation, by factor analysis. It was found that both methods yielded the same three-dimensional solution. Also a two-dimensional configuration could describe the data, and it was shown that this configuration contained representations of unidimensional ratings obtained in other studies.

Keywords

Multidimensional Scaling Emotional Involvement Subjective Distance Elastic Distance Unidimensional Scaling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity.American Journal of Psychology, 1950,63, 516–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratfisch, O. A further study of the relation between subjective distance and emotional involvement.Acta Psychologica, 1969,29, 244–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratfisch, O. and Lundberg, U. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: Experimental validation of the inverse square root law.Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1971, No. 332.Google Scholar
  4. Cliff, N. and Young, F. W. On the relation between unidimensional judgments and multidimensional scaling.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968,3, 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dornič, S. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A verification of the exponent invariance.Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1967, No. 237.Google Scholar
  6. Ekman, G. A direct method for multidimensional ratio scaling.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekman, G. Two methods for the analysis of perceptual dimensionality.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965,20, 557–572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekman, G. Comparative studies on multidimensional scaling and related techniques.Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1970, Suppl. 3.Google Scholar
  9. Ekman, G. and Bratfisch, O. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A psychological mechanism.Acta Psychologica, 1965,24, 446–453.Google Scholar
  10. Ekman, G., Engen, T., Künnapas, T., and Lindman, R. A quantitative principle of qualitative similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 530–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekman, G. and Sjöberg, L. Scaling.Annual Review of Psychology, 1965,16, 451–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, P. E. and Carmone, F. J. Multidimensional scaling: An introduction and comparison of nonmetric unfolding techniques.Journal of Marketing Research, 1969,6, 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guttman, L. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points.Psychometrika, 1968,33, 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling. A numerical method.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 115–130. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lund, T. Multidimensional scaling of geometrical figures.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1970,11, 246–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundberg, U., Bratfisch, O., and Ekman, G. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A summary of investigations.Journal of Social Psychology, 1972,87, 169–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGee, V. E. Multidimensional analysis of ‘elastic distances’.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966,19, 181–196.Google Scholar
  20. McGee, V. E. Multidimensional scaling ofN sets of similarity measures: A nonmetric individual approach.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1968,3, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roskam, E. and Lingoes, J. MINISSA-1, a FORTRAN IV (G) program for smallest space analysis of square symmetric matrices.Behavioral Science, 1970,15, 204–205.Google Scholar
  22. Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–140. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 219–246. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shepard, R. N. and Carroll, J. D. Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis. International symposium (Dayton, Ohio, 1965). Proceedings. New York & London, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  26. Veldman, D. J.FORTRAN programming for the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt, 1967.Google Scholar
  27. Young, F. W. and Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA, a FORTRAN IV program for Shepard-Kruskal multidimensional scaling analysis.Behavioral Science, 1967,12, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Lundberg
    • 1
  • Gösta Ekman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations