Individuals with drinking and drug problems may become particularly reluctant to seek help. To remove barriers to services, more needs to be understood about factors that influence helpseeking decisions. It was hypothesized that certain social psychological influences (attitudes, group cohesion, trust in management) might buffer a reluctance to use services provided by an external Employee Assistance Program (EAP). A random sampling of municipal employees (n=793) completed anonymous questionnaires that assessed willingness to use the EAP, individual drinking and drug use, attitudes toward policy, work group cohesion, and trust in management. Data from the questionnaires were analyzed with multivariate regression analyses to examine the interacting effects of substance abuse and proposed moderators (gender, race, awareness of the EAP, perceptions of policy, cohesion) on willingness to use the EAP. The results demonstrated that although substance abusers were less willing to use the EAP than were nonusers, substance abusers who were aware of the EAP, who had favorable attitudes toward policy, and who did not tolerate coworker substance abuse were as willing to use the EAP as were nonusers. The results also showed that employees with greater awareness of the EAP, support for policy, and perceptions of work group cohesion reported significantly greater willingness to use the EAP than did employees with relatively less awareness of the EAP, policy support, and cohesion. Workplace prevention efforts that are designed to increase the use of EAP services should intentionally target the workplace environment and social context. Creating the awareness and favorability of the EAP, policy, and work group cohesion might buffer substance abusers' reluctance to seek help.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Kopstein A, Gfroerer J. Drug use patterns and demographics of employed drug users: Data from the 1988 NIDA household survey.National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series. 1991;2:11–24.
Lehman WEK, Simpson DD. Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1992;77:309–321.
Blum TC, Roman PM. Employee assistance programs and human resources management.Research in Personnel and Human Resources management. 1989;7:259–312.
Cramer KM. Psychological antecedents to help-seeking behavior: A reanalysis using path modeling structures.Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1999;46:381–387.
Delaney W, Grube JW, Ames GM. Predicting likelihood of seeking help through the employee assistance program among salaried and union hourly employees.Addiction. 1998;93:399–410.
McKirnan D. Community differences in conceptions of deviant behavior: An exploratory study of attitudes toward alcohol-related help sources.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1980;8:637–656.
Browne AC. Drug and alcohol abuse among employees: Critical issues.Employee Assistance Quarterly. 1986;2:11–22.
Trice H, Roman P.Spirits and Demons at Work: Alcohol and Other Drugs on the Job. New York: Cornell University; 1978.
Miller AB. Employee utilization of addiction treatment.Employee Assistance Quarterly. 1990;5:13–31.
Taylor SE, Brown JD. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:198–210.
Brown LM. Ethnic stigma as a contextual experience: A possible selves perspective.Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin. 1998;24:163–172.
Goffman E.Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1963.
Bateson G. The cybernetics of “self”: A theory of alcoholism.Psychiatry. 1971;34:1–18.
Harris MM, Fennel ML. Perceptions of an employee assistance program and employees' willingness to participate.The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1988;24:423–438.
Schmid TL, Jeffery RW, Forster JL, et al. Public support for policy initiatives regulating alcohol use in Minnesota: A multi-community survey.Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1990;51:438–442.
Bennett JB, Lehman WEK. From dual policy to dual attitudes: The social construction of substance use policy.Review of Public Personnel Management, 1997;17:58–83.
Azjen I, Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1980.
Trice HM, Sonnenstuhl WJ. On the construction of drinking norms in work organizations.Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1990;51:201–220.
Brawley LR, Carron AV, Widmeyer WN. Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1988;10:199–213.
Bennett JB, Lehman WEK. Workplace drinking climate, stress, and problem indicators: Assessing the influence of team work (group cohesion).Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1998;59:608–618.
Yalom ID.The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books; 1975.
Scheffler RM, Miller AB. Differences in mental health service utilization among ethnic subpopulations.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1991;14:363–376.
Gerstein LH, Valutis W. Racial differences related to potential helpers' impressions of impaired workers.Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 1991;19:2–10.
Gerstein LH, Moore DT, Duffy K, Dainas C. The effects of biological sex and ethnicity on EAP utilization and referrals.Consulting Psychology Journal. 1993;45:23–27.
Lightner E, McConatha JT. Factors affecting supervisory referrals to employee assistance programs: The impact of race and gender.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1995;10:179–188.
Burke RJ. Utilization of employees' assistance program in a public accounting firm: Some preliminary data.Psychological Reports. 1994;75:264–266.
Coudriet TW, Swisher JD, Grissom G. The role of gender in requests for help in employee assistance programs.Employee Assistance Quarterly. 1987;2:1–12.
Stinson FS, Williams GD, Bertolucci D, et al. Alcohol-related morbidity, 1979–1984.Alcohol Health and Research World. 1987;2:56–61.
Beckman LJ, Amaro H.Barriers to Treatment Among Anglo Women Alcoholics. Los Angeles, Calif: University of California Alcohol and Drug Research Center; 1983.
Milne SH, Blum TC. Roman PM. Factors influencing employees' propensity to use an employee assistance program.Personnel Psychology. 1994;47:123–145.
Sonnenstuhl WJ, Trice HM.Strategies for Employee Assistance Programs: The Crucial Balance. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 1986.
Rouse BA, Kozel NJ, Richards LG.Self-Report Methods of Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph No. 57.)
Keppel G, Zedeck S.Data Analysis for Research Designs: Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression/Correlation Approaches. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1989.
Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications Inc; 1992.
Markus H, Nurius P. Possible selves.American Psychologist. 1986;41:954–969.
Roman PM. Strategic considerations in designing interventions to deal with alcohol problems in the workplace. In: Roman PM, ed.Alcohol Problem Intervention in the Workplace: Employee Assistance Programs and Strategic Alternatives. NY: Quorum Books; 1990;371–406.
Roback HB, Shelton M. Effects of confidentiality limitations on the psychotherapeutic process.Journal of Psychotherapy-Practice and Research. 1995;4:185–193.
Wheeless L, Wheeless V, Dickson-Markman F. A research note: The relations among social and task perceptions in small groups.Small Group Behavior. 1982;13:373–384.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, G.S., Lehman, W.E.K. Levels of substance use and willingness to use the employee assistance program. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 30, 238–248 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289811
- Substance Abuse
- Substance Abuser
- Multivariate Regression Analysis
- Favorable Attitude
- Policy Support