Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Continuity of care and clinical effectiveness: Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the department of veterans affairs

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of the quality of outpatient treatment for patients with severe psychiatric or addictive disorders has often focused on the assessment of continuity of care (COC) as measured with administrative data. However, there has been little empirical evaluation of the relationship of measures of COC and treatment outcomes. This study used hierarchical linear modeling to examine the relationship between 6 indicators of COC and 6 outcome measures in a multisite monitoring effort for veterans with war-related posttraumatic stress disorder. There were few consistently significant associations between COC and outcome measures. Although measures of COC at the level of individual patients were associated with reductions in substance abuse symptoms, when COC measures were averaged to the site level and examined with hierarchical linear modeling models, thereby reducing the impact of intrasite selection bias, they were not associated with any desired outcomes. COC measures, at least in the sample used for this study, are not consistently associated with desirable client outcomes and may therefore be less than ideal performance measures in outcome evaluations following inpatient treatment, except to the extent that COC is considered to be an intrinsic indicator of higher quality regardless of its relationship to outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herman RC, Lregner J, Erickson P, et al. Developing a quality management system for behavioral health care: The Cambridge health alliance experience.Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2000;8:251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steinwachs DM, Wu AW, Skinner EA. How will outcomes management work?Health Affairs. 1994;13:153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clardy JA, Booth BM, Smith LG, et al. Implementing a statewide outcomes management system for consumers of public mental health services.Psychiatric Services. 1998;49:191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brook R, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Part 2: Measuring quality of care.New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;353:966–970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenheck RA, Fontana A, Stolar M. Assessing quality of care: administrative indicators and clinical outcomes in posttraumatic stress disorder.Medical Care. 1999;37:180–188.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Druss BG, Rosenheck RA. Evaluation of the HEDIS behavioral health care measure.Psychiatric Services. 1997;48:71–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bachrach L. Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: a conceptual analysis.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1981;138:1449–1456.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bachrach L. Continuity of care and approaches to case management for long-term mentally ill patients.Hospital Community Psychiatry. 1993;44:465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson S, Prossor D, Bindman J. Continuity of care for the severely mentally ill: concepts and measures.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1997;32:137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehman A, Postrado L, Roth D, et al. Continuity of care and client outcomes in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness.Milbank Quarterly. 1994;72:105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moos R, Finney J, Federman E, et al. Specialty mental health care improves patients' outcomes: findings from a nationwide program to monitor the quality of care for patients with substance use disorders.Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2000;9:704–713.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brekke J, Ansel M, Long J, et al. Intensity and continuity of services and functional outcomes in the rehabilitation of persons with schizophrenia.Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bindman J, Johnson S, Szmukler G, et al. Continuity of care and client outcome: a prospective cohort study.Soc Psychiatry Psychiar Epidemiol. 2000;35:242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenheck RA, Cicchetti D.A Mental Health Program Performance Monitoring System for the Department of Veterans Affairs. West Haven, CT: Northeast Program Evaluation Center; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenheck R, Greenberg G, DiLella D.National Mental Health Program Performance Monitoring System: Fiscal Year 2000 Report. West Haven, CT: Northeast Program Evaluation Center; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell SP, Blank M, Koch JR, et al. Predicting whether patients receive continuity of care after discharge from state hospitals: policy implications.Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 1999;6:279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon P, Gordon B, Davis JM. Reconceptualizing assumptions about community mental health.Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1986;37:708–712.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sytema S, Micciolo R, Tansella M. Continuity of care for patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a comparative Sourth-Verona and Groningen case-register study.Psychological Medicine. 1997;27:1355–1362.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tessler RC, Mason JH. Continuity of care in the delivery of mental services.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1979;136:1297–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bice TW, Boxerman SB. A quantitative measure of continuity of care.Medical Care. 1977;4:347–349.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pugh TP, MacMahon B. Measurement of discontinuity of psychiatric inpatient care.Public Health Reports. 1967;82:533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fontana A, Rosenheck R. Outcome Monitoring of VA Specialized Intensive PTSD Programs: FY 1996 Report. West Haven, CT, Northeast Program Evaluation Center; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fontana A, Rosenheck R. A short form of the Mississippi Scale for measuring combat-related PTSD.Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies. 1994;7:407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McLellan A, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, et al. New data from the addiction severity index: Reliability and validity in three centers.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1985;173:412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kulka R, Schlenger W, Fairbanks J, et al.Trauma and the Vietnam War Generation: Report of Findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. New York; Brunner/Mazel; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Magill M, Senf J. A new method for measuring continuity of care in family practice residencies.Journal of Family Practice. 1986;24:165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW.Hierarchical Linear Models. London: Sage; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kreft I, Leeuw J.Introducing Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hoffman, D. An Overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. 1997.Journal of Management. 1997;23:723–744.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liang K-Y, Zeger Sl. Regression analysis for correlated data.Annual Review of Public Health. 1993;14:43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenheck RA, Frisman L, Essock, S. Impact of VA bed closures on use of state psychiatric services.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001;28(1):58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Desai RA, Rosenheck RA, Rothberg A. Cross-system use among VA mental health patients living in Philidelphia.Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2001;28(4):299–309.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeast Program Evaluation Center, VAMC, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, Connecticut

    Greg A. Greenberg PhD (Project Director), Robert A. Rosenheck MD (Director) & Alan Fontana PhD (Project Director)

  2. Department of Psychiatry at Yale University, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut

    Greg A. Greenberg PhD (Project Director) & Robert A. Rosenheck MD (Director)

  3. VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, USA

    Robert A. Rosenheck MD (Director)

Authors
  1. Greg A. Greenberg PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. Rosenheck MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan Fontana PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, G.A., Rosenheck, R.A. & Fontana, A. Continuity of care and clinical effectiveness: Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the department of veterans affairs. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 30, 202–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289808

Keywords

Search

Navigation