Skip to main content
Log in

Managed care and access to substance abuse treatment services

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using nationally representative data from 1995 and 2000, this study examined how managed care penetration and other organizational characteristics were related to accessibility to outpatient substance abuse treatment. At an organizational level, access was measured as the percentage of clients unable to pay for services; the percentage of clients receiving a reduced fee; and the percentage of clients with shortened treatment because of their inability to pay. Treatment units with both relatively low and relatively high managed care penetration were more likely to support access to care; these units provided care to higher percentages of clients unable to pay and were less likely to shorten treatment because of client inability to pay. Treatment units with midrange managed care penetration were least likely to support access to care. The complexity of managing in an environment of conflicting incentives may reduce the organization's ability to serve those with limited financial means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gondolf E, Coleman K, Roman S. Clinical-based vs. insurance-based recommendations for substance abuse treatment level.Substance Use Misuse. 1996;31(9):1101–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geller JL. Mental health services of the future: managed care, unmanaged care, mismanaged care.Smith College Studies in Social Work. 1996;66(3):223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  3. French MT, Dunlap LJ, Galinis BA, et al. Health care reforms and managed care for substance abuse services: findings from eleven case studies.Journal of Public Health Policy. 1996;17(2):181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galanter M, Keller DS, Dermatis H, et al. The impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment: a report of the American Society of Addiction Medicine.Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2000;19:13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Findlay S. Managed behavioral health care in 1999: an industry at a crossroads.Health Affairs. 1999;18(5):116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle PJ, Callahan D. Managed care and mental health: the ethical issues.Health Affairs. 1995;14(3):7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Cost of Addictive and Mental Disorders and Effectiveness of Treatment. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine.Managing Managed Care: Quality Improvements in Behavioral Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McLellan AT, Woody GE, Metzer D, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. In: Egertson JA, Fox DM, Leshner AI, eds.Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers Inc; 1997:7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander JA, Lemak CH, Campbell CI. Changes in managed care activity in outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations, 1995–2000. Unpublished manuscript; 2002.

  11. National Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey.Respondent Report, 1988–2000. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callahan JJ, Shepard DS, Beinecke RH, et al. Mental health/substance abuse treatment in managed care: the Massachusetts Medicaid experience.Health Affairs. 1995;14(3):173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steenrod S, Brisson A, McCarty D, et al. Effects of managed care on programs and practices for the treatment of alcohol and drug dependence. In: Galanter M, ed.Recent Developments in Alcoholism. New York: Plenum Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander JA, Lemak CH. Directors' perceptions of the effects of managed care on outpatient substance abuse treatment.Journal of Substance Abuse. 1997;9:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Horn RL, Burns LR, Wholey DR. The impact of physician involvement in managed care on efficient use of hospital resources.Medical Care. 1997;35(9):873–889.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lemak CH, Alexander JA. Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001;28(1):12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adams TK, Heeringa SG.Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment System Survey: Technical Documentation for OSATSS-5, 1999–2000. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heeringa SG.Outpatient Drug Abuse Treatment Studies: Technical Documentation. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, et al.Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Friedmann PD, D'Aunno TA, Jin L, et al. Linkage to medical and psychosocial services in outpatient drug abuse treatment organizations: the effect of on-site delivery, external arrangements, case management and transportation on ancillary service utilization.Health Services Research. 2000;35(2):443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Friedmann PD, Alexander JA, D'Aunno TA. Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16(1):71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seale JP, Muramto ML. Substance abuse among minority populations.Substance Abuse. 1993;20:167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alemi F, Stephens RC, Llorens S, et al. A review of factors affecting treatment outcomes: expected treatment outcome scale.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1995;21(4):483–509.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ornstein P, Cherapon JA. Demographic variables as predictors of alcoholism treatment outcome.Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1985;46(5):425–432.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Metzger DS, et al. Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994;62(6):1141–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLellan AT: Patient characteristics associated with outcome. In: Cooper JR, Altman F, Brown BS, et al, eds.Research on the Treatment of Narcotic Addiction: State of the Art. Rockville, Md: National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1983:500–529.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Joe GW, Simpson DD, Sells SB. Treatment process and relapse to opiod use during methadone maintenance.American Journal of drug Alcohol Abuse. 1992;19:124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simpson DD. Effectiveness of drug-treatment: a review of research from field settings. In: Egertson JA, Fox DM, Leshner AI, eds.Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers Inc; 1997:41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCullagh P, Nelder JA:Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Alexander PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, J.A., Nahra, T.A. & Wheeler, J.R.C. Managed care and access to substance abuse treatment services. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 30, 161–175 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289805

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289805

Keywords

Navigation