Abstract
Fifty-two subjects differing in sex, age, education and domicile (rural or urban) were given the problem of judging the height of an upright board in a natural setting. A preliminary analysis was made on the basis of the simple initial ratio method, both for the original data in feet and for original data converted to log units. Because the effects of interaction of the several variables made the results of this method inconclusive, the analysis of variance technique, as described by Yates (11) for data where the classes are not equally represented, was applied. This technique showed that, while together the four factors markedly affected judgment, sex had no significant individual effect, age had the biggest individual effect but possibly a spurious one, education and domicile had suspiciously large individual effects, and the effect of the four factors may be regarded as simply additive. The relation of the findings to those of previous investigators is discussed. The authors regard as an important result of the analysis the guidance it offers in the design of further experiments, since it demonstrates the value of equal representation for all classes into which data are to be segregated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beveridge, W. M. Racial differences in phenomenal regression.Brit. J. Psychol., 1935,26, 59–62.
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. 1936.
Fisher, R. A. and Yates, F. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. 1943.
Holaday, B. E. Die Grossenkonstanz der Sehdinge.Arch. ges. Psychol., 1933,88, 419–486.
Klimpfinger, S. Die Entwicklung der Gestaltkonstanz vom Kind zum Erwachsenen.Arch. ges. Psychol., 1933,88, 599–628.
Locke, N. M. Perception and intelligence: their phylogenetic relation.Psychol. Rev., 1938,45, 335–345.
Mather, K. Statistical analysis in biology. London: Methuen. 1943.
Sheehan, M. R. A study of individual consistency in phenomenal constancy.Arch. Psychol., N. Y., 1938, No. 222.
Thouless, R. H. Individual differences in phenomenal regression.Brit. J. Psychol., 1932,22, 216–241.
Thouless, R. H. A racial difference in perception.J. soc. Psychol., 1933,4, 330–339.
Yates, F. The principles of orthogonality and confounding in replicated experiments.J. agric. Sci., 1933,23, 108–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Responsible for the experiment and general interpretation.
Responsible for the statistical analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ansbacher, H.L., Mather, K. Group differences in size estimation. Psychometrika 10, 37–56 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289792
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289792