Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Note is taken of four related sources of confusion as to the usefulness of Thurstone's factor analysis model and of their resolutions. One resolution uses Tucker's distinction between exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Eight analyses of two sets of data demonstrate the procedures and results of a confirmatory study with statistical tests of some, but not all, relevant hypotheses in an investigation of the stability (invariance) hypothesis. The empirical results provide estimates, as substitutes for unavailable sampling formulations, of effects of variation in diagonal values, in method of factoring, and in samples of cases. Implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, T. W.Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. InProceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Vol. 5. Berkeley: Univ. California Press, 1956. Pp. 111–150.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bargmann, R. Signifikanzuntersuchungen der einfachen struktur in der faktorenanalyse.Sonderdruck, Mit. d. Math. Stat., Physica-Verlag, Wurzburg, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargmann, R. A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 186, 1957.

  5. Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sec., 1950,3, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bechtoldt, H. P. Factor analysis of the Airman Classification Battery with civilian reference tests.HRRC res. Bull., 1953, 53–59.

  7. Bechtoldt, H. P. Statistical tests of hypotheses in confirmatory factor analysis.Amer. Psychologist, 1958,13, 380. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bechtoldt, H. P. Construct validity: a critique.Amer. Psychologist, 1959,14, 619–629.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bechtoldt, H. P. Comments on “Intraclass correlation vs. factor analytic techniques for determining groups of profiles.”Psychol.Bull., 1960,57, 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bechtoldt, H. P. and Moren, R. I. Correlational analyses of test-retest data with a thirty-year intertrial interval.Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 1957,64, 514–519.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bergmann, G. The logic of psychological concepts.Phil. Sci., 1951,18, 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergmann, G.Philosophy of science. Madison: Univ. Wisconsin Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brodbeck, M. The philosophy of science and educational research.Rev. educ. Res., 1957,27, 427–440.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brodbeck, M. Models, meaning, and theories. In L. Gross (Ed.),Symposium on sociological theory. Evanston: Row Peterson, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burt, C. L. Tests of significance in factor analysis.Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sec., 1952,5, 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carroll, J. B. An analytic solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1953,18, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cattell, R. B. Extracting the correct number of factors in factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 791–840.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cureton, E. E. The principal compulsions of factor-analysts.Harvard educ. Rev., 1939,9, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cureton, E. E. A note on the use of Burt's formula for estimating factor significance.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1955,8, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dahlstrom, W. G. Research in clinical psychology: factor analytic contributions.J. clin. Psychol., 1957,13, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eysenck, H. J. The logical basis of factor analysis.Amer. Psychologist, 1953,8, 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Federer, W. T. Testing proportionality of covariance matrices.Ann. math. Statist., 1951,22, 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  23. French, J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors.Psychometric Monogr. No.5. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  24. French, J. W. Manual for kit of selected tests for reference aptitude and achievement factors. Princeton: Educ. Testing Serv., 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guilford, J. P.Psychometric methods. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guilford, J. P. Three faces of intellect.Amer. Psychologist, 1959,14, 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gulliksen, H.Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gulliksen, H. and Wilks, S. S. Regression tests for several samples.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guttman, L. General theory and methods for matrix factoring.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guttman, L. Multiple group methods for common factor analysis: their basis, computation, and interpretation.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guttman, L. What lies ahead for factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 497–515.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guttman, L. To what extent can communalities reduce rank?Psychometrika, 1958,23, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Henrysson, S.Applicability of factor analysis in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H.Factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Howe, W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL No. 1919, 1955.

  37. Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1960,20, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Koopmans, T. C. and Reiersöl, O. The identification of structural characteristics.Ann. math. Statist., 1950,21, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proc. roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1940,60, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Madansky, A. The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error.J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1959,54, 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maxwell, A. E. Statistical methods in factor analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1959,56, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Michael, W. B. Symposium: The future of factor analysis. An over-view of the symposium.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McNemar, Q. On the sampling errors of factor loadings.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peel, E. A. Factorial analysis as a psychological technique.Uppsala Symp. on Psychol. Factor Analysis, 1953, 7–22.

  45. Pinzka, C. and Saunders, D. R. Analytical rotation to simple structure II. Extension to oblique solution. Princeton: Educ. Test Serv., 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rasch, G. On simultaneous factor analysis in several populations.Uppsala Symp. on Psychol. Factor Analysis, 1953, 65–71.

  48. Reiersöl, O. On the identifiability of parameters in Thurstone's multiple-factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stukát, K. G.Suggestibility: a factorial and experimental analysis. (Acta Psychologica Gothoburgensia, II) Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thomson, G.The factorial analysis of human ability. (5th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thurstone, L. L.The vectors of mind. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Thurstone, L. L. Current misuse of the factorial methods.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Thurstone, L. L. Current issues in factor analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1940,37, 189–236.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G. Factorial studies of intelligence.Psychometric Monogr. No.2. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G.Primary mental abilities (manual and tests). Chicago: Sci. Res. Assoc., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tryon, R. C. Communality of a variable: formulation by cluster analysis.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tryon, R. C. General dimensions of individual differences: cluster analysis vs. multiple factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 477–495.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tryon, R. C. Domain sampling formulation of cluster and factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tucker, L. R. The role of correlated factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. PRS Report No. 984. Dept. Army: AGO, Personnel Res. Sec., Washington, D. C., 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tucker, L. R. The objective definition of simple structure in linear factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wherry, R. J. Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wrigley, C. Objectivity in factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wrigley, C. The effect upon the communalities of changing the estimate of the number of factors.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1959,12, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Young, G. and Householder, A. S. Factorial invariance and significance.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Iowa, USA

    Harold P. Bechtoldt

Authors
  1. Harold P. Bechtoldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The computational costs of this study were defrayed, in part, by a research small grant M-1922 from the National Institute of Health, and, in part, by support under project 176-0002 by the University of Iowa Computing Center, Dr. J. P. Dolch, Director. The assistance of Dr. Kern Dickman and Mr. Leonard Wevrick of the University of Illinois and of Mr. Norman Luther of the University of Iowa in handling the computing problems is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechtoldt, H.P. An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis. Psychometrika 26, 405–432 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289771

Keywords

Search

Navigation