Skip to main content
Log in

Some rao-guttman relationships

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An examination of the determinantal equation associated with Rao's canonical factors suggests that Guttman's best lower bound for the number of common factors corresponds to the number of positive canonical correlations when squared multiple correlations are used as the initial estimates of communality. When these initial communality estimates are used, solving Rao's determinantal equation (at the first stage) permits expressing several matrices as functions of factors that differ only in the scale of their columns; these matrices include the correlation matrix with units in the diagonal, the correlation matrix with squared multiple correlations as communality estimates, Guttman's image covariance matrix, and Guttman's anti-image covariance matrix. Further, the factor scores associated with these factors can be shown to be either identical or simply related by a scale change. Implications for practice are discussed, and a computing scheme which would lead to an exhaustive analysis of the data with several optional outputs is outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, T. W.Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cattell, R. B. Parallel proportional profiles and other principles for determining the choice of factors by rotation.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 267–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guttman, L. A necessary and sufficient formula for matric factoring.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communality.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, L. General theory and methods for matric factoring.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates.Psychometrika, 1953,18, 277–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, C. W. Relationships between two systems of factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H.Factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser, H. F. and Dickman, K. Analytic determination of common factors.Amer. Psychol., 1959,14, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael, W. B. and Hunka, S. Research tools: statistical methods.Review of Educational Research, 1960,30, 440–86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, C.W. Some rao-guttman relationships. Psychometrika 27, 247–263 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289622

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289622

Keywords

Navigation