Psychometrika

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 309–326 | Cite as

The influence of communality, factor strength, and loading size on the sampling characteristics of factor loadings

  • Norman Cliff
  • Roger Pennell
Article

Abstract

A Monte Carlo approach is employed in determining whether or not certain variables produce systematic effects on the sampling variability of individual factor loadings. A number of sample correlation matrices were generated from a specified population, factored, and transformed to a least-squares fit to the population values. Influences of factor strength, communality and loading size are discussed in relation to the statistics summarizing the results of the above procedures. Influences producing biased estimators of the population values are also discussed.

Keywords

Public Policy Factor Loading Statistical Theory Sampling Characteristic Systematic Effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechtoldt, H. P. An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 405–432.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, M. A. Comparison of factor analytic techniques. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Union of South Africa, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Cliff, N. Orthogonal rotation to congruence.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 33–42.Google Scholar
  4. Cliff, N. and Hamburger, C. The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Mimeographed report, University of Southern California, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Dwyer, P. S. The square root method and its use in correlation and regression.Journal of American Statistical Association, 1945,40, 493–503.Google Scholar
  6. Efroymsen, M. A. Multiple regression analysis inMathematical methods for digital computers. Ralston, A. and Wilf, H. S. (Ed.), New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. Hamburger, C. D. Factorial stability as a function of analytic rotation method, type of factor pattern and size of sample. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Horn, J. L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 179–185.Google Scholar
  9. Jöreskog, K. G.Statistical estimation in factor analysis. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell, 1963.Google Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K. G. Testing a simple structure hypothesis in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 165–178.Google Scholar
  11. Kaiser, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 187–200.Google Scholar
  12. Kronmal, Richard. Evaluation of a pseudorandom normal number generator.Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1964,2, 357–363.Google Scholar
  13. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A. 1940,60, 64–82.Google Scholar
  14. McNemar, Q.Psychological statistics., New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  15. Pennell, R. The effect of the number of variables on the final rotated factor solution. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Southern California, 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Pennell, R. and Young, F. W. An IBM 7094 program for generating sample correlation matrices from a known population.Behavioral Science, 1967, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.Google Scholar
  18. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Cliff
    • 1
  • Roger Pennell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations