Skip to main content
Log in

Note on use of extreme criterion groups in item discrimination analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to reconsider the Kelley-Cureton definition of optimal extreme groups for estimating item-criterion correlations. Optimal tail per cents are derived, using the criterion of minimum sampling variance of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient, and the findings are related to earlier work of Mosteller. It is shown that upper and lower 27 per cent groups yield the most precise estimate of the tetrachoric coefficient only when the population correlation is close to zero. When the population value is .4, extreme 20 per cent groups provide estimates with the smallest sampling error variance. It is further shown, however, that 27 per cent extremes yield highly efficient estimates. Thus no change is recommended in traditional item analysis procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cureton, E. E. The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fan, Chung-TehItem analysis table. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feldt, L. S. The use of the extreme groups to test for the presence of a relationship.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flanagan, J. C. General considerations in the selection of test items and a short method of estimating the product-moment coefficient from the data at the tails of the distributions.J. educ. Psychol., 1939,30, 674–680.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley, T. L. The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items.J. educ. Psychol., 1939,30, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelley, T. L.The Kelley statistical tables. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kendall, M. G.The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. II. London: Griffin, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mosteller, F. On some useful “inefficient” statistics.Ann. math. Statist., 1946,17, 377–408.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O.Biometrika tables for statisticians. Vol. I. Cambridge, England: Univ. Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peters, C. C. and Van Voorhis, W. R.Statistical procedures and their mathematical bases. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldt, L.S. Note on use of extreme criterion groups in item discrimination analysis. Psychometrika 28, 97–104 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289553

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289553

Keywords

Navigation