Skip to main content
Log in

Another interpretation of a model for paired comparisons

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that the paired-comparison model may be derived from a variety of different initial assumptions about the nature of paired comparisons, some of these assumptions appearing to the author to be more appropriate to a description of the preference-decision process than others. The second contribution of this paper is to note that the generalization of the model to triple comparisons chosen earlier is not the one compatible with the Lehmann model even though it possesses other desirable properties. Limited numerical calculations suggest that both models for triple comparisons give comparable results in applications. Their asymptotic properties should be similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952,39, 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley, R. A. Some statistical methods in taste testing and quality evaluation.Biometrics, 1953,9, 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kendall, M. G. A new measure of rank correlation.Biometrika, 1938,30, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann, E. L. The power of rank tests.Ann. math. Statist., 1953,24, 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luce, R. D.Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley, 1959. Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pendergrass, R. N. and Bradley, R. A. Ranking in triple comparisons. In I. Olkin and others (Eds.),Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1960. Pp. 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Savage, I. R. Contributions to the theory of rank order statistics—the two-sample case.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 580–615.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, W. A., Jr. Characterization of the Bradley-Terry model. Florida State Univ. Statistics Report (mimeo.).

  9. Wilcoxon, F., Rhodes, L. J., and Bradley, R. A. Two sequential two-sample grouped rank tests with application to screening experiments.Biometrics, 1963,19, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by the Office of Naval Research contract number Nonr-988108, Task Order NR042-004. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradley, R.A. Another interpretation of a model for paired comparisons. Psychometrika 30, 315–318 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289494

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289494

Keywords

Navigation