Skip to main content
Log in

Probability matching

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The class of symmetric path-independent models with experimenter-controlled events is considered in conjunction with two-choice probability learning experiments. Various refinements of the notion of probability matching are defined, and the incidence of these properties within this class is studied. It is shown that the linear models are the only models of this class that predict a certain phenomenon that we call stationary probability matching. It is also shown that models within this class that possess an additional property called marginal constancy predict approximate probability matching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bush, R. R. and Mosteller, F.Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Estes, W. K. Probability learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.),Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964, Pp. 89–128.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Estes, W. K. and Suppes P. Foundations of linear models. In R. R. Bush and W. K. Estes (Eds.),Studies in mathematical learning theory. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1959. Pp. 137–179.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Estes, W. K. and Suppes, P.Foundations of statistical learning theory, II.The stimulus sampling model. Tech. Rept. No. 26, Psychol. Ser., Inst. Math. Studies Soc. Sci., Stanford Univer., 1959.

  5. Feldman, J. and Newell, A. A note on a class of probability matching models.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, M. P., Burke, C. J., Cole, M., Keller, L., Millward, R. B., and Estes, W. K. Two-choice behavior under extended training with shifting probabilities of reinforcement. In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.),Studies in mathematical psychology. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1964. Pp. 250–316.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karlin, S. Some random walks arising in learning models.Pacific J. Math., 1953,3, 725–756.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knopp, K.Theory of functions (Part I). New York: Dover, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luce, R. D.Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rose, R. M. Models for experiments with two complementary reinforcing events. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. Pennsylvania, 1964.

  11. Sternberg, S. Stochastic learning theory. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (vol. II). New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research grew out of questions posed by William K. Estes. We are also indebted to Professor Estes for his encouragement and assistance at all stages of this research. During the course of this research J. I. Y. received support from the U. S. Public Health Service (N. I. M. H.). M. F. N.'s present address is the University of Pennsylvania. J. I. Y.'s present address is the University of Minnesota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, M.F., Yellott, J.I. Probability matching. Psychometrika 31, 43–60 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289456

Keywords

Navigation