A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis

Abstract

It is suggested that if Guttman's latent-root-one lower bound estimate for the rank of a correlation matrix is accepted as a psychometric upper bound, following the proofs and arguments of Kaiser and Dickman, then the rank for a sample matrix should be estimated by subtracting out the component in the latent roots which can be attributed to sampling error, and least-squares “capitalization” on this error, in the calculation of the correlations and the roots. A procedure based on the generation of random variables is given for estimating the component which needs to be subtracted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]

    Anderson, T. W.An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Dickman, K. W. Factorial validity of a rating instrument. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. Illinois, 1960.

  3. [3]

    Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Kaiser, H. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. (Paper read at a symposium on application of computers to psychological problems. Meeting of Amer. Psychol. Ass., 1959).

  5. [5]

    Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A.The advanced theory of statistics (Vols. I and II). London, Eng.: Griffin, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Rao, C. R.Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: Wiley, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to acknowledge the valuable help given by J. Jaspers and L. G. Humphreys in the development of the ideas presented in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30, 179–185 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Policy
  • Correlation Matrix
  • Statistical Theory
  • Latent Root
  • Sampling Error