Abstract
The variance of the number of mutual dyads in a sociometric situation where each member of a group chooses independently and at random is derived for unrestricted numbers of choices per group member, as well as for a fixed number of choices. The distribution of the number of mutuals is considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bronfenbrenner, U. A constant frame of reference for sociometric research.Sociometry, 1943,6, 363–397.
Crisswell, Joan H. Foundations of sociometric measurement.Sociometry, 1946,9, 7–13.
David, F. N. and Kendall, M. G. Tables of symmetric functions—part I.Biometrika, 1949,36, 431–449.
Edwards, Daisy S. The constant frame of reference problem in sociometry.Sociometry, 1948,11, 372–379.
Feller, W. Probability theory and its applications. Vol. 1, New York: Wiley, 1950.
Loomis, C. P. and Pepinsky, H. B. Sociometry, 1937–1947: theory and methods.Sociometry, 1948,11, 262–286.
Moreno, J. L. and Jennings, Helen H. Sociometric measurement of social configurations, based on deviations from chance.Sociometry Monographs, No. 3, 1945, Beacon House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are indebted to Robert Bush and Hartley Rodgers of Harvard University for helpful criticisms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, L., Wilson, T.R. The variance of the number of mutual choices in sociometry. Psychometrika 21, 299–304 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289141
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289141