Skip to main content
Log in

“Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At least four approaches have been used to estimate communalities that will leave an observed correlation matrixR Gramian and with minimum rank. It has long been known that the square of the observed multiple-correlation coefficient is a lower bound to any communality of a variable ofR. This lower bound actually provides a “best possible” estimate in several senses. Furthermore, under certain conditions basic to the Spearman-Thurstone common-factor theory, the bound must equal the communality in the limit as the number of observed variables increases. Otherwise, this type of theory cannot hold forR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Golub, G. H. On the number of significant factors as determined by the method of maximum likelihood. (Stencilled) Digital Computer Laboratory, Univ. of Illinois, 1954.

  2. Guttman, L. Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates.Psychometrika, 1953,18, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In Paul F. Lazarsfeld (ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences, Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guttman, L. The determinacy of factor score matrices, with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory.Brit. J. stat. Psychol., 1955,8, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was facilitated by a grant from the Lucius N. Littauer Foundation to the American Committee for Social Research in Israel in order to promote methodological work of the Israel Institute of Applied Social Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika 21, 273–285 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289137

Keywords

Navigation