Psychometrika

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 99–114 | Cite as

Scale analysis and the measurement of social attitudes

  • Allen L. Edwards
  • Franklin P. Kilpatrick
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses and compares the methods of attitude scale construction of Thurstone (method of equal-appearing intervals), Likert (method of summated ratings), and Guttman (method of scale analysis), with special emphasis on the latter as one of the most recent and significant contributions to the field. Despite a certain lack of methodological precision, scale analysis provides a means of evaluating the uni-dimensionality of a set of items. If the criteria for uni-dimensionality are met, the interpretation of rank-order scores is made unambiguous, and efficiency of prediction from the set of items is maximized. The Guttman technique, however, provides no satisfactory means of selecting the original set of items for scale analysis. Preliminary studies indicated that both the Likert and the Thurstone methods tend to select scalable sets of items and that their functions in this respect are complementary. A method of combining the Likert and Thurstone methods in order to yield a highly scalable set of items is outlined. Sets of 14 items selected by the method have, in the two cases where the technique has been tried, yielded very satisfactory scalability.

Keywords

Public Policy Significant Contribution Statistical Theory Social Attitude Scale Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamic, L. A nation of nations. New York: Harpers, 1945.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drake, St. C., & Cayton, H. R. Black metropolis. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1945.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards, A. L., & Kenney, K. C. A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction.J. appl. Psychol., 1946,30, 72–83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards, A. L. A critique of “neutral” items in attitude scales constructed by the method of equal appearing intervals.Psychol. Rev., 1946,53, 159–169.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards, A. L. On Guttman's scale analysis.Educ. psychol. Meas. In press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, A. L., & Kilpatrick, F. P. The scale-discrimination method for measuring social attitudes.J. appl. Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferguson, L. W. A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction.J. soc. Psychol., 1941,13, 51–57.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by “scale analysis.”Psychol. Bull., 1941,44, 149–161.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guttman, L. A basis for scaling qualitative data.Amer. sociol. Rev., 1944,9, 139–150.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis.Amer. sociol. Rev., 1947,12, 57–67.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guttman, L. The desire of enlisted men for post-war full-time schooling: an example of a scale. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Survey 63-E.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guttman, L. Questions and answers about scale analysis. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Report D-2, 1945.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guttman, L. The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Mimeographed, 1946.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guttman, L. On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1947,44, 451–465.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Likert, R. Technique for the measurement of attitudes.Arch. Psychol., 1932, No. 140, 55 pp.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thurstone, L. L. & Chave, E. J. The measurement of attitude. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1929.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thurstone, L. L. & Peterson, R. C.Scale for the measurement of attitude toward capital punishment: Form A. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thurstone, L. L.Scale for the measurement of attitude toward communism: Form B. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen L. Edwards
    • 1
  • Franklin P. Kilpatrick
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations