Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability formulas that do not assume experimental independence

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tautologies are established for the reliability coefficientρ 2 t of the sum ofn part scores. It is not assumed that the part scores are experimentally independent of each other nor that the parts are equivalent to each other. The tautologies show the exact role played by experimental dependence and nonequivalence of parts, respectively, in the reliability of the sum. The formal algebra is appropriate to reliability in the sense of repeated trials of the same test, as well as in the sense of a universe of parallel tests, although the empirical meanings are different. Emphasis is on practical formulas that require information from only a single experiment (or test). These can take the form only of lower bounds toρ 2 t , four of which are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cronbach, Lee J., and Warrington, W. G. Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gulliksen, Harold. Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guttman, Louis. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttman, Louis. A special review of Gulliksen'sTheory of mental tests.Psychometrika. 1953,18, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, Louis. The reliability of speeded or noncompleted tests. (In preparation).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttman, L. Reliability formulas that do not assume experimental independence. Psychometrika 18, 225–239 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289060

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289060

Keywords

Navigation