Skip to main content
Log in

A component model for stimulus variables in discrimination learning

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general function is derived describing the conditioning of a single stimulus component in a discriminative situation. This function, together with the combinatorial rules of statistical learning theory [5, 12], generates empirically testable formulas for learning of classical two-alternative discriminations, probabilistic discriminations, and discriminations based on the outcomes of preceding trials in partial reinforcement experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke, C. J., Estes, W. K., and Hellyer, S. Rate of verbal conditioning in relation to stimulus variability.J. exp. Psychol., 1954,48, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bush, R. R. and Mosteller, F. A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.Psychol. Rev., 1951,58, 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Estes, W. K. Learning. In Annual review of psychology, 1956,7, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Estes, W. K. Theory of learning with constant, variable, or contingent probabilities of reinforcement.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Estes, W. K. and Burke, C. J. A theory of stimulus variability in learning.Psychol. Rev., 1953,60, 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Estes, W. K. and Burke, C. J. Application of a statistical model to simple discrimination learning in human subjects.J. exp. Psychol., 1955,50, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Estes, W. K., Burke, C. J., Atkinson, R. C., and Frankmann, J. P. Probabilistic discrimination learning.J. exp. Psychol., 1957, in press.

  8. Estes, W. K. and Straughan, J. H. Analysis of a verbal conditioning situation in terms of statistical learning theory.J. exp. Psychol., 1954,47, 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hake, H. W. and Hyman, R. Perception of the statistical structure of a random series of binary symbols.J. exp. Psychol., 1953,45, 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neimark, Edith D. Effects of type of non-reinforcement and number of alternative responses in two verbal conditioning situations.J. exp. Psychol., 1956,52, 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Restle, F. A theory of discrimination learning.Psychol. Rev., 1955,62, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schoeffler, M. S. Probability of response to compounds of discriminated stimuli.J. exp. Psychol., 1954,48, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wyckoff, L. B., Jr. The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.Psychol. Rev., 1952,59, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The researches on which this paper is based were facilitated by a grant from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burke, C.J., Estes, W.K. A component model for stimulus variables in discrimination learning. Psychometrika 22, 133–145 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289049

Keywords

Navigation