Abstract
A factorial study of fluency was undertaken to test an hypothesis that at least two fluency abilities would be measured by a battery composed both of word fluency tests used by Thurstone and tests of fluency described by several British investigators. Twenty-eight tests, including ten reference tests for five primary mental abilities, were administered to 181 high-school seniors. Ten centroid factors were extracted, a simple structure was found, and eight factors were interpreted. Five factors defined were the following reference abilities: memory (M), number (N), reasoning (R), verbal comprehension (V), and perceptual speed (P), the last one being somewhat tentatively identified. The main finding is the analysis of fluency into two factors: word fluency (W) and ideational fluency (F). Word fluency is defined as a facility in producing single, isolated words that contain one or more formal restrictions, without reference to the meaning of the words. Ideational fluency is described as a facility in expressing ideas by the use of words and their meanings. Another verbal ability indicated is tentatively interpreted as verbal versatility, the ability to express essentially the same idea by means of several different words or combinations of words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, John B. A factor analysis of verbal abilities.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 279–307.
Carroll, John B. The factorial representation of mental ability and academic achievement.Educ. psychol. Meas., 1943,3, 307–332.
Cattell, Raymond B. Temperament tests. I. Temperament.Brit. J. Psychol., 1932–33,23, 308–329.
Cattell, Raymond B. Temperament tests. II. Tests.Brit. J. Psychol., 1933–34,24, 20–49.
Cattell, Raymond B.A guide to mental testing. London: Univ. London Press, 1936.
Coombs, Clyde H. A criterion for significant common factor variance.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 267–272.
Goldstein, K. The problem of the meaning of words based upon observation of aphasic patients.J. Psychol., 1935,2, 301–316.
Hargreaves, H. L. The “faculty” of imagination. Brit. J. Psychol., Monograph Supplements, No. 10. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927.
Huber, Mary. Re-education of aphasics.J. speech Disorders, 1942,7, 289–293.
Johnson, D. M. and Reynolds, F. A factor analysis of verbal ability.Psychol. Record, 1941,4, 183–195.
Lashley, Karl S. Coalescence of neurology and psychology.Proc. Amer. philos. Soc., 1941,84, 461–470.
Nielson, J. M.Agnosia, apraxia, aphasia: their value in cerebral localization. 2d ed. revised. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., Medical Books, Harper Bros., 1946.
Notcutt, B. Perseveration and fluency.Brit. J. Psychol., 1943,33, 200–208.
Stephenson, W. and and others. Spearman factors and psychiatry.Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1934,14, 101–135.
Studman, L. Grace. Studies in experimental psychiatry. V. ‘w’ and ‘f’ factors in relation to traits of personality.J. ment. Science, 1935,81, 107–137.
Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.
Thurstone, L. L.Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1938.
Thurstone, L. L. An experimental study of simple structure.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 153–168.
Thurstone, L. L. A single plane method of rotation.Psychometrika, 1946,11, 71–79.
Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G.Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, No. 2. Chicago: Univ. chicago Press, 1941.
Weisenberg, Theodore and McBride, Katherine E.Aphasia, a clinical and psychological study. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1935.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The writer wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. L. L. Thurstone for his guidance throughout the study and for providing facilities and materials needed; to Miss Jessie LaSalle and the Washington, D. C., high schools for providing the subjects; to Ledyard Tucker, Frank Medland, and Mrs. Virginia Brown for computational assistance; and to others who gave aid during the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, C.W. A factorial study of fluency in writing. Psychometrika 12, 239–262 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288939
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288939