Skip to main content
Log in

A factorial study of fluency in writing

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A factorial study of fluency was undertaken to test an hypothesis that at least two fluency abilities would be measured by a battery composed both of word fluency tests used by Thurstone and tests of fluency described by several British investigators. Twenty-eight tests, including ten reference tests for five primary mental abilities, were administered to 181 high-school seniors. Ten centroid factors were extracted, a simple structure was found, and eight factors were interpreted. Five factors defined were the following reference abilities: memory (M), number (N), reasoning (R), verbal comprehension (V), and perceptual speed (P), the last one being somewhat tentatively identified. The main finding is the analysis of fluency into two factors: word fluency (W) and ideational fluency (F). Word fluency is defined as a facility in producing single, isolated words that contain one or more formal restrictions, without reference to the meaning of the words. Ideational fluency is described as a facility in expressing ideas by the use of words and their meanings. Another verbal ability indicated is tentatively interpreted as verbal versatility, the ability to express essentially the same idea by means of several different words or combinations of words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll, John B. A factor analysis of verbal abilities.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 279–307.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll, John B. The factorial representation of mental ability and academic achievement.Educ. psychol. Meas., 1943,3, 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cattell, Raymond B. Temperament tests. I. Temperament.Brit. J. Psychol., 1932–33,23, 308–329.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cattell, Raymond B. Temperament tests. II. Tests.Brit. J. Psychol., 1933–34,24, 20–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cattell, Raymond B.A guide to mental testing. London: Univ. London Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coombs, Clyde H. A criterion for significant common factor variance.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein, K. The problem of the meaning of words based upon observation of aphasic patients.J. Psychol., 1935,2, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hargreaves, H. L. The “faculty” of imagination. Brit. J. Psychol., Monograph Supplements, No. 10. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huber, Mary. Re-education of aphasics.J. speech Disorders, 1942,7, 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, D. M. and Reynolds, F. A factor analysis of verbal ability.Psychol. Record, 1941,4, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lashley, Karl S. Coalescence of neurology and psychology.Proc. Amer. philos. Soc., 1941,84, 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nielson, J. M.Agnosia, apraxia, aphasia: their value in cerebral localization. 2d ed. revised. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., Medical Books, Harper Bros., 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Notcutt, B. Perseveration and fluency.Brit. J. Psychol., 1943,33, 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephenson, W. and and others. Spearman factors and psychiatry.Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1934,14, 101–135.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Studman, L. Grace. Studies in experimental psychiatry. V. ‘w’ and ‘f’ factors in relation to traits of personality.J. ment. Science, 1935,81, 107–137.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thurstone, L. L.Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thurstone, L. L. An experimental study of simple structure.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thurstone, L. L. A single plane method of rotation.Psychometrika, 1946,11, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G.Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, No. 2. Chicago: Univ. chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weisenberg, Theodore and McBride, Katherine E.Aphasia, a clinical and psychological study. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The writer wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. L. L. Thurstone for his guidance throughout the study and for providing facilities and materials needed; to Miss Jessie LaSalle and the Washington, D. C., high schools for providing the subjects; to Ledyard Tucker, Frank Medland, and Mrs. Virginia Brown for computational assistance; and to others who gave aid during the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, C.W. A factorial study of fluency in writing. Psychometrika 12, 239–262 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288939

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288939

Keywords

Navigation