Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ahmavaara, Y.Transformation analysis of factorial data. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemian, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmavaara, Y. and Markkanen, T.The unified factor model. Helsinki: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, No. 7, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T. W.Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. InProc. of the Third Berkeley Symp. on math. Statist. and Probability. Vol. 5. Berkeley: Univ. California Press, 1956. Pp. 111–150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bargmann, R. E. A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 186, 1957.

  6. Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sec., 1950,3, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, M. R. and Nagel, E.An introduction to logic and scientific method. (3rd ed.) London: Harcourt Brace, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darmois, G. Observations théoriques sur l'analyse factorielle linéaire et générale.Colloques Intern. du Centre de la Rech. Scient., 1955,58, 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  9. French, J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors.Psychometric Monogr. No.5, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components (second part).J. educ. Psychol., 1933,24, 498–520.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hotelling, H. Relation of the newer multivariate statistical methods to factor analysis.Colloques Intern. du Centre de la Rech. Scient., 1955,58, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howe, W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL No. 1919, 1955.

  13. Kendall, M. G. and Smith, B. Factor analysis.J. Roy. statist. Soc. Ser. B, 1950,12, 60–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1940,60, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, S. N.Some aspects of multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomson, Sir Godfrey.The factorial analysis of human ability. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tucker, L. R. A method of synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section, Rep. No. 984, 1951.

References

  1. Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by scale analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1947,44, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green, B. F. Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.),Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1954. Pp. 335–369.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guilford, J. P.Psychometric methods. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttman, L. On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1947,44, 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitude scales.Arch. Psychol., 1932, No. 140.

  6. Menzel, H. A new coefficient for scalogram analysis.Publ. Opin. Quart., 1953,17, 268–280.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitra, S. K. Contributions to the statistical analysis of categorical data. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 142, 1955.

  8. Roy, S. N. and Kastenbaum, M. A generalization of analysis of variance and multivariate analysis to data based on frequencies in qualitative categories or class intervals. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 131, 1955.

  9. Stevens, S. S. On the theory of scales of measurement.Science, 1946,103, 670–680.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stouffer, S. A., Guttman, L., Suchman, E. A., and Lazarsfeld, P. F.Measurement and prediction. Studies in social psychology during World War II, Vol. 4. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stouffer, S. A., Borgatta, E. F., Hays, D. G., and Henry, A. F. A technique for improving cumulative scales.Publ. Opin. Quart., 1952,16, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bargmann, R., McGill, W.J., Thrall, R.M. et al. Book reviews. Psychometrika 25, 105–125 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288937

Navigation