Skip to main content
Log in

The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under assumptions that will hold for the usual test situation, it is proved that test reliability and variance increase (a) as the average inter-item correlation increases, and (b) as the variance of the item difficulty distribution decreases. As the average item variance increases, the test variance will increase, but the test reliability will not be affected. (It is noted that as the average item variance increases, the average item difficulty approaches .50). In this development, no account is taken of the effect of chance success, or the possible effect on student attitude of different item difficulty distributions. In order to maximize the reliability and variance of a test, the items should have high intercorrelations, all items should be of the same difficulty level, and the level should be as near to 50% as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll, John B. The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dressel, Paul L. Some remarks on the Kuder-Richardson Reliability coefficient.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson, G. A. The factorial interpretation of test difficulty.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, R. W. B. and Ferguson, G. A. Studies on the reliability of tests. Bull. No. 12 of the Dept. of Educ. Res., Univer. of Toronto, 371 Bloor St. West, Toronto 5.

  5. Kelley, T. L. Statistical method. New York: Macmillan, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuder, G. F. and Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson, M. W. The relation of difficulty to the differential validity of a test.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Symonds, P. M. Factors influencing test reliability.J. educ. Psychol., 1928,19, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thurstone, L. L. A method of scaling psychological and educational tests.J. educ. Psychol., 1925,16, 433–451.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thurstone, L. L. The scoring of individual performance.J. educ. Psychol., 1926,17, 446–457.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thurstone, T. G. The difficulty of a test and its diagnostic value.J. educ. Psychol., 1932,23, 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The desirability of determining this relationship has been indicated by previous writers. Work on the present paper arose out of some problems raised by Dr. Herbert S. Conrad in connection with an analysis of aptitude tests.

On leave for Government war research from the Psychology Department, University of Chicago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulliksen, H. The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability. Psychometrika 10, 79–91 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288877

Keywords

Navigation