Abstract
The cost and financing of mental health services is gaining increasing importance with the spread of managed care and cost-cutting measures throughout the health care system. The delivery of mental health services through structured employee assistance programs (EAPs) could be undermined by revised health insurance contracts and cutbacks in employer-provided benefits at the workplace. This study uses two recently completed national surveys of EAPs to estimate the costs of providing EAP services during 1993 and 1995. EAP costs are determined by program type, worksite size, industry, and region. In addition, information on program services is reported to determine the most common types and categories of services and whether service delivery changes have occurred between 1993 and 1995. The results of this study will be useful to EAP managers, mental health administrators, and mental health services researchers who are interested in the delivery and costs of EAP services.
References
Survey of Employer Anti-Drug Programs. BLS Report 760. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1989.
Hayghe H: Anti-drug programs in the workplace: Are they here to stay?Monthly Labor Review, April 1991, pp. 26–28.
Hartwell TD, Steele PD, French MT, et al.: Aiding troubled employees: Prevalence, cost, and characteristics of employee assistance programs (EAPs) in the United States.American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86:804–808.
Hartwell TD, Steele PD, French MT, et al.:Prevalence of Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) in the United States: 1995. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Public Health Association, San Diego, October 1995.
Sonnenstuhl WJ, Trice HM:Strategies for Employee Assistance Programs: The Crucial Balance. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1990.
Tompkins C:Drug Abuse among Workers and Employee Assistance Programs. NIDA Drug Abuse Services Research Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1991.
Blum TC, Martin JK, Roman PM: A research note on EAP prevalence, components and utilization.Journal of Employee Assistance Research 1992; 1:209–229.
French MT, Zarkin GA, Bray JW, et al.: Costs of employee assistance programs: Findings from a national survey of worksites.American Journal of Health Promotion 1997; 11:219–222.
Analysis of Data from Dun's Market Identifiers. Charlotte, NC: Dun and Bradstreet, Dun's Market Service, November 1993.
Boyle KE, Potter FJ, Rush M, et al.: Survey methodology and performance characteristics for the national surveys of worksites and employee assistance programs. In:Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: ASA, 1995, pp. 485–490.
Bray JW, French MT, Bowland BJ, et al.: The cost of employee assistance programs (EAPs): Findings from seven case studies.Employee Assistance Quarterly 1996; 11(4):1–19.
Roman PM, Blum T: The core technology of employee assistance programs.The ALMACAN 1985; 15:8–19.
Roman PM: Growth and transformation in workplace alcoholism programming. In Galanter M (Ed.):Recent Developments in Alcoholism. New York: Plenum, 1988, pp. 131–158.
Potter FJ, Boyle KE, Steele PD, et al.: Characteristics of Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) in the U.S. during 1993. Unpublished manuscript, Research Triangle Institute, 1995.
Hartwell TD, Steele PD, Rodman NA, et al.: Prevalence of drug testing in the workplace.Monthly Labor Review, November 1996, pp. 35–42.
Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS:SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 6.40. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1995.
Williams RL, Perritt RL:The Weighted Median Test for Finite Population Samples. Paper presented at the American Statistical Association Joint Statistical Meetings, Chicago, August 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
French, M.T., Zarkin, G.A., Bray, J.W. et al. Cost of employee assistance programs: Comparison of national estimates from 1993 and 1995. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 26, 95–103 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287797