Skip to main content
Log in

A confirmatory factor analysis of the BASIS-32 in racial and ethnic samples

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study performed confirmatory factor analysis across major racial and ethnic groups of the BASIS-32, a measure of functional status of persons receiving mental health treatment and suitable for routine assessment mental health care. The purpose was to perform a preliminary investigation of cross-cultural equivalence in a county-level mental health program in a major metropolitan area. The results indicated a factor structure similar to that reported in the literature, and they suggested acceptable levels of agreement in structure between racial and ethnic minority groups and whites. The study revealed little reason to believe that the BASIS-32 varied in underlying structure across racial and ethnic boundaries, although further research is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazade N. NRI and NASMHPD managed care performance indicator project.Outlook. Summer 1998:4–7.

  2. Steinwachs DM, Flynn LM, Norquist GS, et al. Editors notes. In: Steinwachs DM, Flynn LM, Skinner EA, eds.Using Outcomes Information To Improve Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnham MA. Measuring outcomes of care for substance abuse and mental disorders. In: Steinwachs DM, Flynn LM, Skinner EA, eds.Using Outcomes Information To Improve Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grobb MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation.Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1994;45:242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russo JR, Roy-Byrne P, Jaffe C, et al. The relationship of patient administered outcome assessments to quality of life and physician ratings: validity of the BASIS-32.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24:200–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman FL, Capelli K, Mastrianni X. Measuring treatment outcome for adults and adolescents: reliability and validity of the BASIS-32.The Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24:316–331.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen SV, Wilcox M, Leff HS, et al. Assessing behavioral health outcomes in outpatient programs: reliability and validity of the BASIS-32.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1999;26(4):5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisen SV, Leff HS, Schaefer E. Implementing outcome systems: lessons from a test of the BASIS-32 and the SF-36.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1999;26:18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Snowden LR. Ethnic minority populations and mental health outcomes. In: Steinwachs DM, Flynn LM, Skinner EA, eds.Using Outcomes Information To Improve Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O'Sullivan MJ, Peterson PD, Cox GB, et al. Ethnic populations: community mental health services ten years later.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1989;17:17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung FK, Snowden LR. Community mental health and ethnic minority populations.Community Mental Health Journal. 1990;26:277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snowden LR. Managed care and ethnic minority populations.Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 1998;25:581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tabachnick B, Fidell L.Using Multivariate Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelloway E.Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Research Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Browne M, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K, Long J, eds.Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dillon W, Goldstein M.Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snowden LR, Thoman K. Medicaid and African American outpatient treatment.Mental Health Services Research. 2000;2:115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Broman CL. Coping with personal problems. In: Neighbors HW, Jackson JS, eds.Mental Health in Black America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996:117–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Chun-Chung Chow PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chow, J.CC., Snowden, L.R. & McConnell, W. A confirmatory factor analysis of the BASIS-32 in racial and ethnic samples. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 400–411 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287771

Keywords

Navigation