Skip to main content
Log in

A five-year population study of persons involved in the mental health and local correctional systems: Implications for service planning

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between recipients of mental health services and incarceration within local jails. The analyses showed that male and female recipients of mental health services are incarcerated in local jails at a higher rate than the general community but that most are not long-term incarcerations. The study further showed that the rate of incarceration for recipients of mental health services decreases with age but the relative risk of incarceration, when compared with the general population, actually increases with age. In addition, across all age groups female recipients of mental health services were found to be at greater risk of incarceration than male recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maguire K, Pastore AL, ed.Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1997. NCJ publication 171147.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teplin L. Prevalence of severe mental disorder among male urban jail detainees: comparison with epidemiological catchment area program.American Journal of Public Health. 1990;80:663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck A. An overview of national jail statistics at the Bureau of Justice Statistics.American Jails. 1997;X(6):10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ditton P.Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program; 1999. NCJ publication 174463.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steinwachs D, Kasper J, Skinner E.Family Perspectives on Meeting the Needs for Care of Severely Mentally Ill Relatives: A National Survey. Final report to NAMI by the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Maryland Center on Organization and Financing of Care for the Severely Mentally Ill. Baltimore, MD: 1992.

  6. Wolff N, Diamond RJ, Helminiak TW. A new look at an old issue: people with mental illness and the law enforcement system.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24:152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pandiani JA, Banks SM, Schacht LM. Using incarceration rates to measure mental health program performance.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1998;25(3):300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Powell TA, Holt JC, Fondacaro KM. The prevalence of mental illness among inmates in a rural state.Law and Human Behavior. 1997;21(4):427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Statewide Comprehensive Plan for Mental Health Services 1997–2001. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Mental Health; 1997.

  10. Pandiani JA, Banks SM, Schacht LM. Personal privacy versus public accountability: a technological solution to an ethical dilemma.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1998;25(4):456–463.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banks SM, Pandiani JA. The use of state and general hospitals for inpatient psychiatric care.American Journal of Public Health. 1988;88(3):448–451.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Banks SM, Pandiani JA.A Methodology for Estimating Caseload Size and Overlap. The Evaluation Center @ Human Services Research Institute; 1999.

  13. Pandiani JA, Banks SM, Gauvin L. A global measure of access to mental health services for a managed care environment.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24(3):268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehead AN, Russell B.Principia Mathematical, Volume 1. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cox JF, Banks SM, Stone JL. Counting the mentally ill in jails and prisons.Psychiatric Services. 2000;51(4):533.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luntz Research Companies and QEV Analytics.Back to School 1999 National Survey of American Attitudes on Substance Abuse V: Teens and Their Parents. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA); 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harry B, Steadman HJ. Arrest rates of patients treated at a community mental health center.Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1988;39(8):862–866.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The MHSIP Consumer Oriented Mental Health Report Card. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Project. Washington, DC: Center for Mental Health Services; 1996.

  19. Torrey EF, Stieber J, Ezekiel J, et al.Criminalizing the Seriously Mentally Ill: The Abuse of Jails as Mental Hospitals. Arlington, VA: Public Citizens Health Research Group and the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Torrey EF.Out of the Shadows. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maintaining Medicaid Benefits for Jail Detainees with Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders. SAMHSA Jail Diversion Knowledge Development and Application Initiative. Rockville, MD: DHHS; Summer 1999.

  22. Lindquist P, Allebeck P. Schizophrenia and crime: a longitudinal follow-up of 644 schizophrenics in Stockholm.British Journal of Psychiatry. 1990;157:345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hodgins S. Mental disorder and crime: evidence from a birth cohort.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1992;49:476–483.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gallo JJ, Lebowitz BD. The epidemiology of common late-life mental disorders in the community: themes for the new century.Psychiatric Services. 1999;50(9):1158–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Staff Study: Aging of New York State's Population. Albany, NY: State of New York Office of the State Comptroller, Division of Management Audit and State Financial Services; 1998.

  26. Griffin PA.The Back Door of the Jail: Linking Mentally Ill Offenders to Community Mental Health Services. In:Jail Diversion for the Mentally Ill: Breaking through the Barriers. Boulder, CO: National Institute of Corrections; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cox JF, Morschauser PC. Community forensic initiatives in New York State.Innovations & Research. 1993;2:29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Conklin TJ, Lincoln T, Flanigan TP. A public health model to connect correctional health care with communities.American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88(8):1249–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Steadman HJ, Mulvey E, Monahan J, et al. Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1998;55:393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clark RE, Ricketts BS, McHugo GJ. Legal system involvement and costs for persons in treatment for severe mental illness and substance abuse use disorders.Psychiatric Services. 1999;50(5):641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chavez N, Arons B, Barry C.Jail Diversion, Knowledge Development and Application Program. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith F. Cox MA, CCHP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, J.F., Morschauser, P.C., Banks, S. et al. A five-year population study of persons involved in the mental health and local correctional systems: Implications for service planning. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 177–187 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287460

Keywords

Navigation