Skip to main content
Log in

Managed care in the public sector: Lessons learned from the los angeles PARTNERS program

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PARTNERS is the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health's capitated managed care treatment program. To explore the context in which public sector managed care reforms are occurring and to understand the obstacles to implementing such programs, qualitative data were collected from administrators, case managers, and clients. Administrators were found to need assistance in negotiating managed care contracts and in tracking costs. Case managers, although concerned about increased clinical demands, enjoyed the flexibility and creativity their new roles allowed. Clients were satisfied with their increased independence, even though many had to change their site of care. Beyond considering these concerns, the range of community stakeholders who may be affected by such interventions must be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoge MA, Jacobs S, Thakur NM, Griffith EE. Ten dimensions of public-sector managed care.Psychiatric Services. 1999;50(1):51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Essock SM, Goldman HH. States' embrace of managed mental health care.Health Affairs. 1995;14(3):34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Young AS, Sullivan G, Murata D, Sturm R, Koegel P. Implementing publicly funded risk contracts with community mental health organizations.Psychiatric Services. 1998;49(12):1579–1584.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang CF, Kiser LJ, Bailey JE, et al. Tennessee's failed managed care program for mental health and substance abuse services.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279(11):864–869.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehman AF. Strategies for improving services for the chronic mentally ill.Hospital & Community Psychiatry. 1989;40(9):916–920.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mechanic D, Aiken LH. Capitation in mental health: potentials and cautions.New Directions for Mental Health Services. 1989;43:5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lehman AF. Capitation payment and mental health care: a review of the opportunities and risks.Hospital & Community Psychiatry. 1987;38(1):31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dickey B, Norton EC, Normand SL, Azeni H, Fisher WH. Managed mental health experience in Massachusetts.New Directions for Mental Health Services. 1998;78:115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lurie N, Christianson JB, Gray DZ, Manning WG Jr, Popkin MK. The effect of the Utah Prepaid Mental Health Plan on structure, process, and outcomes of care.New Directions for Mental Health Services. 1998;78:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapur K, Young AS, Murata D, Sullivan G, Koegel P. The economic impact of capitated care for high utilizers of public mental health services: the Los Angeles PARTNERS program experience.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1999;26(4):416–429.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geller JL, Brown JM, Fisher WH, Grudzinskas AJ Jr, Manning TD. A national survey of “consumer empowerment” at the state level.Psychiatric Services. 1998;49(4):498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young AS, Forquer SL, Tran A, Starzynski M, Shatkin J. Identifying clinical competencies that support rehabilitation and empowerment in individuals with severe mental illness.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2000;27:321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML, Crean T. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services.Psychiatric Services. 1997;48(8):1042–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1985;102(4):520–528.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1988;3(5):448–457.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liberman RP, Kopelowicz A, Young AS. Biobehavioral treatment and rehabilitation of schizophrenia.Behavior Therapy. 1994;25:89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mueser KT, Glynn SM. Family intervention for schizophrenia. In: Dobson KS, Craig KD, eds.Empirically-Supported Therapies: Best Practices in Professional Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Annual Report to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health; 1993.

  19. Patton MQ.How To Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lincoln YS, Guba EG.Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krueger RA.Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan DL.Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart DL, Shamdasani PN.Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Young AS, Grusky O, Sullivan G, Webster CM, Podus D. The effect of provider characteristics on case management activities.Administration & Policy in Mental Health. 1998;26(1):21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ben-Dror R. Employee turnover in community mental health organization: a developmental stages study.Community Mental Health Journal. 1994;30(3):243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gillespie DF, Numerof RE. Burnout among health service providers.Administration & Policy in Mental Health. 1991;18(3):161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oberlander LB. Work satisfaction among community-based mental health service providers: the association between work environment and work satisfaction.Community Mental Health Journal. 1990;26(6):517–532.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lehman AF. Quality of care in mental health: the case of schizophrenia.Health Affairs. 1999;18(5):52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Young AS, Sullivan G, Burnam MA, Brook RH. Measuring the quality of outpatient treatment for schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1998;55(7):611–617.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kissling W. Compliance, quality assurance and standards for relapse prevention in schizophrenia.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum. 1994;382:16–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greer Sullivan MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, G., Young, A.S., Fortney, S. et al. Managed care in the public sector: Lessons learned from the los angeles PARTNERS program. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 155–163 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287458

Keywords

Navigation