Skip to main content
Log in

Public sector managed care for substance abuse treatment: Opportunities for health services research

  • Special Section
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observations of reduced utilization of alcohol and drug abuse treatment following the introduction of managed behavioral health care suggest that substance abuse services may be especially responsive to managed care restrictions and limits. In publicly funded treatment systems, patient attributes, system and provider characteristics, and financing mechanisms may heighten susceptibility to unintended effects. The State Substance Abuse and Mental Health Treatment Managed Care Evaluation Program reviewed state managed care programs for publicly funded alcohol and drug treatment services and is evaluating programs in Arizona, Iowa, Maryland, and Nebraska. The article describes initiatives and outlines evaluation activities. It discusses the opportunities and challenges of assessing public managed care plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldman W, McCulloch J, Sturm R. Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care.Health Affairs. 1998;17(3):40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ma CA, McGuire TG. Costs and incentives in a behavioral health carve-out.Health Affairs. 1998;17(2):53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sturm R, Goldman W, McCulloch J. Mental health and substance abuse parity: a case-study of Ohio's state employee program.Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 1998;1:129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callahan JJ, Shepard DS, Beinecke RH, Larson MJ, Cavanaugh D. Mental health/substance abuse treatment in managed care: the Massachusetts Medicaid experience.Health Affairs. 1995;14(3):173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank RG, McGuire TG, Notman EH, Woodward RM. Developments in Medicaid managed behavioral health care. In:Mental Health US: 1996. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank RG, McGuire TG. Savings from a Medicaid carve-out for mental health and substance abuse services in Massachusetts.Psychiatric Services. 1997;48(9):1147–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steenrod S, Brisson A, McCarty D, Hodgkin D. Effects of managed care on programs and practices for the treatment of alcohol and drug dependence. In: Galanter M, ed.Recent Advances in Alcoholism Treatment. Vol 15. New York: Plenum Press. In press.

  8. Brisson AS.Changes in a Managed Behavioral Health Care Carve-out and the Impact on Substance Abuse Services. Waltham, MA: Heller Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare, Brandeis University; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brisson AE, Frank RG, Berenbaum PA, Gazmararian JA. Changes in a managed behavioral health care carve-out and the impact on mental health and substance abuse spending and rates of use. Unpublished manuscript. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy.

  10. Stein B, Elaine R, Sturm R. Substance abuse service utilization under managed care: HMOs versus carve-out plans.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1999;26(4):451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mechanic D, Schlesinger M, McAlpine DD. Management of mental health and substance abuse services: state of the art and early results.The Milbank Quarterly. 1995;73:19–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Institute of Medicine.Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Institute of Medicine.Treating Drug Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): Data for 1995 and 1980–1995. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): Data for 1996 and 1980–1996. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): Data for 1997 and 1980–1997. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steenrod SA.The Relationship between Managed Care and Standardized Clinical Practices in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Programs in New England: A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Heller Graduate School, Brandeis University. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKusick D, Mark TL, King E, et al. Spending for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment, 1996.Health Affairs. 1998;17(5):147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schoenbaum M, Zhang W, Sturm R. Costs and utilization of substance abuse care in a privately insured population under managed care.Psychiatric Services. 1998;49:1573–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thieman AA, Avant LL.Evaluation of IMSACP Managed Care Contract for Medicaid Funded Substance Abuse Services in Iowa. Ames, IA: Iowa State University; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oliver TR. The collision of economics and politics in Medicaid managed care: reflections on the course of reform in Maryland.The Milbank Quarterly. 1998;76(1):59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singer J, Szanton S.Crisis of Access: How To Insure Treatment for Addiction among Baltimore's Poor in the Age of Managed Care: The Abell Report. 1999;12(2), Baltimore, MD; 1999. Available at www.abell.org/abellreportmarch99.htm.

  23. Horgan CM.Financing of Drug Abuse Treatment and Prevention Services. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCarty D. Between despair and hope: health services research on treatment of alcohol abuse.Addiction. 2000;95(supplement 3):S439-S447.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garnick DW, Hodgkin D, Horgan CM. Selecting data sources for alcohol services research. Unpublished manuscript. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCarty D, McGuire TG, Harwood HJ, Field T. Using state information systems for drug abuse services research.American Behavioral Scientist. 1998;41(8):1090–1106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis McCarty PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarty, D., Argeriou, M., Denmead, G. et al. Public sector managed care for substance abuse treatment: Opportunities for health services research. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 143–154 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287457

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287457

Keywords

Navigation