A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in ontario
This brief report describes a feasibility study conducted to assess the level of satisfaction with the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) rater reliability training, the ease of achieving interrater reliability in rating CAFAS, and the clinical utility of CAFAS as an outcome measurement tool for the province of Ontario, from the perspective of service providers. This study has been instrumental in the development of a 4-year province-wide measurement initiative. The study proved useful to government policy and decision-makers, mental health administrators, clinicians, and mental health service researchers interested in the implementation of outcome measurement tools. It highlighted the fact that at least 85% of respondents were satisfied with CAFAS training and the ease of achieving interrater reliability. The majority identified the usefulness of the tool in case formulation and the value in tracking changes over time.
KeywordsMental Health Health Service Service Provider Health Promotion Mental Health Service
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Raphael D, Weir P, Weston A, et al.Outcome Measurement in Children's Mental Health. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services; 1999.Google Scholar
- 2.Koch JR, Lewis A, McCall D. A multistakeholder-driven model for developing an outcome management system.Journal of Behavioural Health Services and Research. 1998;25(2):151–162.Google Scholar
- 3.Hodges K.Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. 3rd ed. Ypsilanti, Mich: Eastern Michigan University; 2000.Google Scholar
- 4.Hodges K, Wong M. Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale to predict service utilization and cost.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24(3):278–290.Google Scholar
- 5.Hodges K, Gust J. Measures of impairment for children and adolescents.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1995;22:403–413.Google Scholar
- 6.Hodges K.Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale Self-Training Manual. 3d ed. Ypsilanti, Mich: Eastern Michigan University; 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.Hodges K, Wong M. Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale.Journal of Child and Family Studies. 1996;5(4):445–467.Google Scholar
- 8.Erlandson D, Harris E, Skipper BL, et al. Quality criteria for a naturalistic study. In: Erlandson D, Skipper BL, Allen SD, eds.Doing Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1993:131–161.Google Scholar