Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of client and mental health worker assessment of needs and unmet needs

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was set up to examine agreement on needs identified by mental health clients and their primary mental health workers. Mental health workers assessed a convenience sample of clients who completed an interview about the services they receive. Data were collected from 78 client and staff dyads regarding 11 need domains. Mental health workers and clients did not agree on the number of needs (ICC=0.42). Kappa coefficients indicated significant agreement between staff and clients for only 1 of the 11 need domains (vocational need κ=0.67; others ranged from 0 to 0.58). The data further revealed that mental health workers and clients disagreed about unmet needs (κ ranged from −0.07 to 0.46). There findings show that clients and staff have divergent opinions regarding needs. Integrating clients' perspectives into treatment plans may help address this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Making it Happen: Operational Framework for the Delivery of Mental Health Services and Supports. Queen's Printer for Ontario; 1999:1–65.

  2. Gallagher J, Teesson M. Measuring disability, need and outcome in Australian community mental health services.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;34:850–855.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ericson BG, Hansson J-H, Teike T. Urgent need for a Need Assessment Scale in monitoring social support: a validation study on the Swedish version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need.Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 1997;51:173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Phelan M, Slade M, Thornicroft G, et al. The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness.British Journal of Psychiatry. 1995;167:589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Slade M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G, et al. The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1996;31:109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slade M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G. A comparison of needs assessed by staff and by an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis.Psychological Medicine. 1998;28:543–550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson L, Vinding HR, Mackeprang T, et al. Comparison of key worker and patient assessment of needs in schizophrenic patients living in the community: a Nordic multicentre study.Acta Psychiatria Scandinavia. 2001;103:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Middelboe T, Mackeprang T, Thalsgaard A, et al. A housing support programme for the mentally ill: need profile and satisfaction among users.Acta Psychiatria Scandinavia. 1998;98:321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gannon M, Ryan M, Kinsella A. Assessment of need in patients attending an inner city psychiatric service.Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2000;17(1):25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lasalvia A, Ruggeri M, Mazzi MA, et al. The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona Outcome Project 3.Acta Psychiatria Scandinavia. 2000;102:366–375.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Issakidis C, Teesson M. Measurement of need for care: a trial of the Camberwell Assessment of Need and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;33:754–759.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carter MF, Crosby C. Developing reliability in client-centered mental health needs assessment.Journal of Mental Health. 1996;5:233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Comtois G, Morin C, Lesage A, et al. Patients versus rehabilitation practitioners: a comparison of assessments of needs for care.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;43:159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crane-Ross D, Roth D, Lauber BG. Consumers' and case managers' perceptions of mental health and community support service needs.Community Mental Health Journal. 2000;36:161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenheck R, Lam JA. Homeless mentally ill clients' and providers' perceptions of service needs and clients' use of services.Psychiatric Services. 1997;48:381–386.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sainfort F, Becker M, Diamond R. Judgments of quality of life of individuals with severe mental disorders: patient self-report versus provider perspectives.The American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;153:497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calsaferri K, Jongbloed L. Three perspectives on the rehabilitation needs of consumers.Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health. 1999;18:199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Massey OT, Wu L. Three critical views of functioning: comparisons of assessments made by individuals with mental illness, their case managers, and family members.Evaluation and Program Planning. 1994;17:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiersma D, Nienhuis FJ, Giel R, et al. Stability and change in needs of patients with schizophrenia disorders: a 15- and 17-year follow-up from first onset of psychosis, and a comparison between “objective” and “subjective” assessments of needs for care.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1998;33:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wagenfeld MO, Murray JD, Mohatt DF, et al. Mental health service delivery in rural areas: organizational and clinical issues. In: Robertson EB, Sloboda Z, Boyd GM, Beatty L, Kozel NJ, eds.Rural Substance Abuse: State of Knowledge and Issues. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1997:418–437.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin E, Goering P, Offord DR, et al. The use of mental health services in Ontario: epidemiologic findings.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;41:572–577.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fortney J, Rost K, Zhang M, et al. The impact of geographic accessibility on the intensity and quality of depression treatment.Medical Care. 1999;37:884–893.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rost K, Zhang M, Fortney J, et al. Rural-urban differences in depression treatment and suicidality.Medical Care. 1998;36:1098–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dottl SL, Greenley JR. Rural-urban differences in psychiatric status and functioning among clients with severe mental illness.Community Mental Health Journal. 1997;33:311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bédard M, Martin NJ, Krueger P, et al. Assessing reproducibility of data obtained with instruments based on continuous measurements.Experimental Aging Research. 2000;26:353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meade MO, Cook RJ, Guyatt GH, et al. Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2000;161:85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Arvidsson H. Needs assessed by patients and staff in a Swedish sample of severely mentally ill subjects.Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2001;55:311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thornicroft G, Johnson S, Lesse M, et al. The unmet needs of people suffering from schizophrenia. In: Andrews G, Henderson S, eds.Unmet Need in Psychiatry. Problems, Resources, Responses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000:197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Bruce ML, et al. The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.Health Services Research. 2001;36:987–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Middelboe T, Mackeprang T, Hansson L, et al. The Nordic study on schizophrenia patients living in the community. Subjective needs and perceived help.European Psychiatry. 2001;16:207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Slade M. Needs assessment: involvement of staff and users will help to meet needs.British Journal of Psychiatry. 1994;165:293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roth D, Crane-Ross D. Impact of services, met needs, and service empowerment on consumer outcomes.Mental Health Services Research. 2002;4:43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Goldberg RW, Green-Paden LD, Lehman AF, et al. Correlates of insight in serious mental illness.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2001;189(3):137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Corrigan PW, Penn D. Disease and discrimination: two paradigms that describe severe mental illness.Journal of Mental Health. 1997;6:355–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bédard PhD.

Additional information

He is also director of research, Research Department, St. Joseph's Care Group, Lakehead Psychiatric Hospital, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bédard, M., Gibbons, C. & Mack, G. A comparison of client and mental health worker assessment of needs and unmet needs. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 32, 95–104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287331

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287331

Keywords

Navigation