Abstract
The aim of the study is to predict long-term outcomes of methadone maintenance (MM), other than continued heroin use, on the basis of drug use occurring early in MM treatment. In previous research, the weak association of initial drug use during MM with measures of rehabilitation status may be due to the use of measures that do not differentiate trends in different types of drug use. In the present study, 222 patients who completed 6 months of MM were assessed at program intake, evaluated for opiates and cocaine in the first 6 months of treatment, and given a follow-up assessment 2 years after treatment entry. The intake status of the patients was assessed using the Addiction Severity Index. Opiate and cocaine use during the first 6 months of MM was assessed by urine toxicology. Outcomes were assessed using a structured interview and official criminal records at follow-up. Cluster analysis of urine toxicologies during treatment identified 3 trajectory classes of MM patients: (A) variably high levels of opiate use, but consistently low cocaine use; (B) low and diminishing opiate and cocaine use; and (C) consistently high cocaine use, with diminishing opiate use. In an 18-month period, after these trends were observed, Cluster C had significantly more criminal charges than Cluster B had (3 times as many), but not significantly more than those of Cluster A. Clusters A and B did not differ significantly in criminal charges. Regardless of cluster membership, subjects with increasing levels of cocaine use in the first 6 months of MM had more hospitalizations for drug and alcohol problems during the follow-up period than subjects without increasing levels of cocaine use had. The results provide evidence of negative sequelae of cocaine use during MM that underscore the importance of clinical efforts to reduce levels of cocaine and other nonopiate drug use by MM patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ward J, Mattick RP, Hall W. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: an overview.Drug & Alcohol Review. 1994;13:327–336.
Milby JB. Methadone maintenance to abstinence: how many make it?Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. 1988;176:409–422.
McLellan AT, Arndt IO, Metzger D, et al. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;269:1953–1959.
Joe GW, Simpson DD, Hubbard RL. Unmet service needs in methadone maintenance.International Journal of the Addictions. 1991;26:1–22.
Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, et al. Outcome after methadone treatment: influence of prior treatment factors and current treatment status.Drug & Alcohol Dependence 1994;35:223–230.
Belding MA, McLellan AT, Zanis DA, et al. Characterizing “nonresponsive” methadone patients.Journal of Substance Treatment. 1998;15:485–492.
Morral AR, Iguchi MY, Belding MA, et al. Natural classes of treatment response.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1997;65:673–685.
Simpson DD, Tims FM. Treatment effectiveness.National Institute on Drug Abuse: Treatment Research Notes. 1981:4–7.
Rowan-Szal GA, Chatham LR, Simpson DD. Importance of identifying cocaine and alcohol dependent methadone clients.American Journal on Addictions. 2000;9:38–50.
Powers KI, Anglin MD. A differential assessment of the cumulative versus stabilizing effect of methadone maintenance treatment.Evaluation Review. 1998;22:175–206.
McGahan PL, Griffith JA, Parente R, et al.Composite Scores From the Addiction Severity Index. Philadelphia, Pa: Veterans Administration and National Institute on Drugs and Alcohol; 1990.
Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline followback: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZA J, ed.Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:41–72.
Carey KB. Reliability and validity of the time line follow back interview among Psychiatric outpatients.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1997;11:26–33.
Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK.Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1984.
Ward J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1963;58:236–244.
Rutherford MJA, Arthur I, Cacciola JS, et al. Gender differences in diagnosing antisocial personality disorder in methadone patients.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1995;152:1309–1316.
Rutherford MJC, John S, Alterman AI, et al. Assessment of object relations and reality testing in methadone patients.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;153:1189–1194.
Cacciola JS, Alterman A, Rutherford M, et al. The course of change in methadone maintenance.Addictions. 1998;93:41–49.
Park C, Dudycha A. A cross-validation approach to sample size determination for regression models.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1974;69:214–218.
Alterman AI, Kampman K, Boardman CR, et al. A cocaine-positive baseline urine predicts outpatient treatment attrition and failure to attain initial abstinence.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1997;46:79–85.
US General Accounting Office.Methadone Maintenance: Some Treatment Programs Are Not Effective: Greater Federal Oversight Needed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1990. DHHS Publication No. GAO/HRD 90-140.
Joe GW, Simpson DD, Sells SB. Treatment process and relapse to opioid use during methadone maintenance.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1994;20:173–197.
Caplehorn JR, Dalton M, Stella YN, et al. Retention in methadone maintenance and heroin addicts's risk of death.Addiction. 1994;89:203–209.
Zanis DA, Woody GE. One year mortality rates following methadone treatment discharge.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;52:257–260.
Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, et al. Patterns of improvement after methadone maintenance treatment: 1 year follow up results from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2000;60:275–286.
Morral AR, Belding MA, Iguchi MY. Identifying methadone maintenance clients at risk for poor treatment response: pretreatment and early progress indictors.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1999;55:25–33.
Darke S. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment, 3: moderators of treatment outcome. In: Ward J, Mattick, Richard P, eds.Methadone Maintenance Treatment and Other Opioid Replacement Therapies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998:75–89.
Iguchi MY, Lamb RJ, Belding MA, et al. Contingent reinforcement of group participation versus abstinence in a methadone maintenance program.Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 199;4:315–321.
Rosenblum A, Magura S, Palij M, et al. Enhanced treatment outcomes for cocaine-using methadone patients.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1999;54:207–218.
Dole VP, Joseph H. Long-term outcome of patients treated with methadone maintenance.Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 1978;311:181–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bovasso, G., Cacciola, J. The long-term outcomes of drug use by methadone maintenance patients. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 30, 290–303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287318
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287318