Skip to main content
Log in

Substance abuse intervention for health care workers: A preliminary report

  • Research-In-Progress
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Workplace Managed Care Cooperative Agreement project targets 3,300 health care professionals in hospital, specialty clinic, and primary care settings located in metropolitan New Mexico communities. This project will evaluate whether enhancements to existing substance abuse prevention/early intervention programs can prevent the onset of risky drinking, reduce prevalence of risky drinking, better identify employees who abuse alcohol and drugs, and improve employee wellness. This article describes one such enhancement (Project WISE [Workplace Initiative in Substance Education]), implemented at Lovelace Health Systems. Project WISE includes relatively low-cost elements such as substance abuse awareness training, information on how to reduce drinking, and brief motivational counseling. Evaluation will consist of baseline comparisons of the intervention and comparison sites, a process evaluation, a qualitative analysis using focus groups, and an outcome evaluation using health and work records. Methodological challenges, solutions, and implications for researchers undertaking similar projects are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1991. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA)93-1980. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1993.

  2. Lehman WE, Simpson DD: Patterns of drug use in a large metropolitan workforce.NIDA Research Monograph 1990; 100:45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lehman W, Simpson D: Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors.Journal of Applied Psychology 1992; 77:309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alleyne BC, Stuart P, Copes R: Alcohol and other drug use in occupational facilities.Occupational Medicine 1991; 3:496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheridan J, Winkler H: An evaluation of drug testing in the workplace.NIDA Res Monographs 1989; 91:195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:Survey of Employer Antidrug Programs. Report 760. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blum TC, Roman PM, Harwood EM: Employed women with alcohol problems who seek help from employee assistance programs. In: Galanter M (Ed.):Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Vol. 12: Women and Alcoholism. New York: Plenum, 1995, pp. 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook RF, Back AS, Trudeau J: Preventing alcohol use problems among blue-collar workers: A field test of the working people program.Substance Use & Misuse 1996; 31:255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fries JF, Fries ST, Parcell CL, et al.: Health risk changes with a low-cost individualized health promotion program: Effects at up to 30 months.American Journal of Health Promotion 1992; 6:364–371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagihara S, Kusaka Y, Morimoto K, et al.: Health risk appraisal (HRA) and its educational effect on bank employees.Industrial Health 1992; 30:61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fries JF, Harrington H, Edwards R, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of cost reductions from a health education program: The California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) Study.American Journal of Health Promotion 1994; 329(5):321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heaney CA, Goetzel RZ: A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs.American Journal of Health Promotion 1997; 11:290–308.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mrazek PJ:Preventing Mental Health and Substance Abuse Problems in Managed Health Care Settings. Alexandria, VA: National Mental Health Association, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. New Mexico Highway and Transportation Department, Traffic Safety Bureau:1998 Annual Report. Albuquerque: Division of Government Research, University of New Mexico, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. New Mexico Department of Health/Public Health Division:1996 New Mexico Selected Health Statistics Annual Report. Santa Fe, NM: Vital Records and Health Statistics Bureau, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, B: Heroin a family legacy for some in state.Albuquerque Journal, Jan. 3, 1999.

  17. Sanchez-Craig M:Low-Risk Drinking: Patient Workbook for Quitting or Cutting Down. Toronto, Ontario: College of Family Physicians of Canada, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The ISA Group:Say Yes (video). Alexandria, VA, 1990.

  19. The ISA Group:Connection Series (video). Alexandria, VA, 1996.

  20. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Brief intervention for alcohol problems.Alcohol Alert No. 43, April 1999.

  21. Miller W, Rollnick S:Motivational Interviewing. New York: Guilford, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller WR, Sanchez VC: Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change. In: Howard G (Ed.):Issues in Alcohol Use and Misuse in Young Adults. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Graham AW, Fleming MS: Brief interventions. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, Wilford BB (Eds.):Principles of Addiction Medicine. Second ed. Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1998, pp. 615–630.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Fourth ed., Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1990.

  25. Koch GG, Landis JR, Freeman JL, et al.: A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurements of categorical data.Biometrics 1977; 33:133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL: Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.Biometrika 1986; 73:13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mantel N, Haenszel W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1959; 22:719–748.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grizzle JE, Starmer CF, Koch GG: Analysis of categorical data by linear models.Biometrics 1969; 25:489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hughes PH, Brandenburg N, Baldwin DC Jr., et al.: Prevalence of substance use among U.S. physicians.Journal of the American Medical Association 1992; 267:2333–2339.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hyde GL, Wolf J: Alcohol and drug use by surgery residents.Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1995; 181:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bohigian GM, Croughan JL, Sanders K: Substance abuse and dependence in physicians: An overview of the effects of alcohol and drug abuse.Missouri Medicine 1994; 91:233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heckman JJ, Robb R. Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. In: Wainer H (Ed.):Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. New York: Springer, 1986, pp. 63–107.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heckman JJ, Robb R: Selection modeling versus mixture modeling with nonignorable nonresponse. In: Wainer H (Ed.):Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. New York: Springer, 1986, pp. 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Holland PW: Statistics and causal inference.Journal of American Statistical Association 1986; 81:945–960.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pelletier KR: A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs at the worksite: 1993–1995 update.American Journal of Health Promotion 1996; 10:380–388.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gibbons LW: Corporate fitness programmes and health enhancement.Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 1989; 18:272–278.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dean BS, Krenzelok EP: The cost of employee turnover to a regional poison information center.Veterinarian and Human Toxicology 1994; 36:60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Finkelstein BS, Silvers JB, Rosenthal GE: The importance of outcomes data in health care decision making and purchasing.Marketing Health Services 1997; Summer:52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hartwell TD, Steele P, French MT, et al.: Aiding troubled employees: The prevalence, cost, and characteristics of employee assistance programs in the United States.American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86:804–808.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Trinkoff AM, Storr CL: Substance use among nurses: Differences between specialties.American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88:581–585.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra C. Lapham M.D., M.P.H..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lapham, S.C., Chang, I. & Gregory, C. Substance abuse intervention for health care workers: A preliminary report. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 27, 131–143 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287308

Keywords

Navigation