Tangled in a web of affiliation

Social support networks of dually diagnosed women who are trauma survivors
Special Issue

Abstract

The goal of this article is to describe the social support networks of women with co-occurring substance abuse and mental health problems who are survivors of interpersonal abuse, using baseline interview data from 2 sites (n=644) from the national Women Co-occurring Disorders and Violence Study. The size and composition of women's networks, the tangible and socioemotional support available, and the stance of the support network toward substance use, treatment, and trauma are described. Family members are described by women as offering less emotional support and less encouragement for healing from trauma than friends. Analyses demonstrated only modest support in either sample for the hypothesis that support network characteristics moderate the effects of traumatic stress on mental health and trauma symptoms among these samples of very burdened and poor women. The results point to the need for using caution in relying on women's existing social support network to help them heal.

Keywords

Mental Health Substance Abuse Mental Health Problem Support Network Traumatic Stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Granello PF. A comparison of wellness and social support networks in different age groups.Adultspan Journal. 2001;3:12–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffith J. Social support providers: who are they, where are they met, and the relationship of network characteristics to psychological distress.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1985;6:42–60.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandler IN, Barrera M. Toward a multimethod approach to assessing the effects of social support.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1984;12:37–52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colarossi LG. Adolescent gender differences in social support: structure, function and provider type.Social Work Research. 2001;25:233–241.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Froland C, Brodsky G, Olson M, et al. Social supports and social adjustment: implications for mental health professionals.Community Mental Health Journal. Summer 1979;15:82–93.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sokolovsky J, Cohen C, Berger D, et al. Personal networks of ex-mental patients in a Manhattan SRO hotel.Human Organization. 1978;37:5–16.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Bassel N, Cooper DK, Chen D-R, et al. Personal social networks and HIV status among women on methadone.AIDS Care. December 1998;10:735–749.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, et al. Norms, social networks and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users.Social Science & Medicine. 2003;56:465–476.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller M, Ncaigus A. Networks, resources and risk among women who use drugs.Social Science & Medicine. 2001;52:967–979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development.Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53:371–399.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolkow KE, Ferguson BH. Community factors in the development of resiliency: considerations and future direction.Community Mental Health Journal. 2001;37:489–498.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Bassel N, Chen D-R, Cooper D. Social support and social network profiles among women on methadone.Social Service Review. 1998;72:379–401.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falkin G, Strauss SM. Social supporters and drug use enablers: a dilemma for women in recovery.Addictive Behaviors. 2003;28:141–155.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beels CC. Social support and schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1981;7:58–72.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP.Stressful Life Events: Their Nature and Effects. New York: Wiley; 1974.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health.Science. July 29, 1988;241:540–545.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin N, Dean A, Ensel W.Social Support, Life Events and Depression. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lipton FR, Cohen CI, Fischer F, et al. Schizophrenia: a network crisis.Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1981;7:144–151.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moxley DP. Measuring the social support network of persons with psychiatric disabilities: a pilot investigation.Psychological Rehabilitation Journal. 1988;112:19–27.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pattison EM, Pattison ML. Analysis of a schizophrenic psychosocial network.Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1981;7:135–143.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health related functions of social support.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1981;4:381–406.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van der Poel MGM. Delineating personal support networks.Social Networks. 1993;15:49–70.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andrews G, Tennant C, Hewson D, et al. Life event stress, social support, coping style and risk of psychological impairment.Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. 1978;166:307–316.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coyne JC, Bolger N. Doing without social support as an explanatory concept.Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 1990;9:148–158.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weissman MM. Advances in psychiatric epidemiology: rates and risks for major depression.American Journal of Public Health. 1987;77:445–451.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aranda MP, Castenada I, Lee P, et al. Stress, social support and coping as predictors of depressive symptoms: gender differences among Mexican Americans.Social Work Research. 2001;25:37–48.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support intervention: do they work?Clinical Psychology Review. 2002;22:381–441.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health.Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119:448–531.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aneshensel CS. Social stress: theory and research.Annual Review of Sociology. 1992;18:15–38.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wills TA. Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, eds.Social Support and Health. New York: Academic Press; 1985:61–77.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Berkman LF, Glass T. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.Social Science & Medicine. 2000;51:843–857.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strauss SM, Falkin G. Social support systems of women offenders who use drugs: a focus on the mother-daughter relationship.American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse. 2001;27:65–88.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stowe A, Ross MW. Significant relationships and social supports of injecting drug users and their implications for HIV/AIDS services.AIDS Care. January 1993;5:23–34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    The National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. General social survey codebook. Available at: http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/GSS/. Accessed September 7, 2004.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cosden M, Cortez-Ison E. Sexual abuse, parental bonding, social support, and program retention for women in substance abuse treatment.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16:149–155.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gomberg ESL, Nirenberg TD. Antecedents and consequences. In: Gomberg ESL, Nirenberg TD, eds.Women and Substance Abuse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1993:118–141.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fry PS, Barker LA. Quality of relationships and structural properties of social support networks of female survivors of abuse.Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monograms. 2002;128:139–165.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilson-Cohn C, Strauss SM, Falkin GP. The relationship between partner abuse and substance use among women mandated to drug treatment.Journal of Family Violence. 2002;17:91–106.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Derogatis LR. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report.Psychological Medicine. 1983;13:595–605.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wolfe J, Kimmerling R, Brown P, et al. The life stressor checklist—revised. In: Stamm BH, ed.Instrumentation in Stress, Trauma and Adaptation. Northbrook, Ill: Sidran Press; 1996:198–200.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Foa EB, Riggs DS, Dancu CV, et al. Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder.Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1993;6:459–473.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1980;168:26–33.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Salmon MM, Joseph BM, Saylor CS, et al. Women's perception of provider, social, and program support in an outpatient drug treatment program.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19:239–246.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    O'Dell KJ, Turner NH, Weaver GD. Women in recovery from drug misuse: an exploratory study of their social networks and social support.Substance Use & Misuse. 1998;33(8):1721–1734.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alemi F, Stephens R, Llorens S, Schaefer D, et al. The orientation of social support measure.Addictive Behaviors. 2003;28:1285–1298.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dufour MH, Nadeau L. Sexual abuse: acomparison between resilient victims and drug-addicted victims.Violence & Victims. 2001;16:655–672.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lin N, Peek MK. Social networks and mental health. In: Horwitz AV, Scheid TL, eds.A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories, and Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999:241–258.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Testa M, Miller BA, Downs WR, et al. The moderating impact of social support following childhood sexual abuse.Violence & Victims. 1992;7:173–186.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Turner RJ. Social support and coping. In: Horwitz AV, Scheid TL, eds.A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories, and Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999:198–210.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Volkman R, Cressey DR. Differential association and the rehabilitation of drug addicts.American Journal of Sociology. 1963;69:129–142.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deleon G, Beschner GM.The Therapeutic Community. Washington, DC: National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1977.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beschner GM, Reed BG, Mondonaro J.Treatment Services for Drug Dependent Women. Vol 1. Washington, DC: National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1981.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Finkelstein N. Using the relational model as a context for treating pregnant and parenting chemically dependent women.Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment. 1996;6(5):23–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Savage
    • 1
  • Andrea Savage
    • 2
  • Lisa A. Russell
    • 3
  1. 1.Hunter College School of Social WorkCity University of New YorkNew York
  2. 2.the Hunter College School of Social Work and Deputy Executive Officer in the PhD Program in Social Welfare, Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkUSA
  3. 3.ETR AssociatesScotts Valley

Personalised recommendations