Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are barriers to mental health and substance abuse care still rising?

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study estimates unmet need and barriers to alcohol, drug, and mental health (ADM) services in 1997 to 1998 using data from a national household survey (n=9,585). In 1997 to 1998, 10.9% of the population perceived a need for ADM services, with 15% obtaining no treatment and 11% experiencing delays or obtaining less care than needed. The rate of unmet need due to no treatment is similar to earlier studies, but the group experiencing delays/less care is almost as large. This finding emphasizes the importance of defining access to care more broadly by including timeliness and intensity of care. Economic barriers are highest for the uninsured, but also are high among the privately insured. Individuals with unmet need are significantly more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Those with no conventional mental health care rely on self-administered treatment, while those with delayed/insufficient conventional care use CAM providers and self-administered treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. US Dept of Health and Human Services.Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General (December 1999). Available at: www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/index.html. Accessed March 2000.

  2. Hay Group.Health Care Plan Design and Cost Trends—1988 through 1997. Washington, DC: Hay Group; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Advisory Mental Health Council.Parity in Financing Mental Health Services: Managed Care Effects on Cost, Access, and Quality. Interim Report to Congress by the National Advisory Mental Health Council, National Institute of Mental Health. Washington DC: National Advisory Mental Health Council; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman W, McCulloch J, Sturm R. Costs and utilization of mental health services before and after managed care.Health Affairs. 1998;17(2):40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ma C, McGuire T. Costs and incentives in a mental health carve-out.Health Affairs. 1998;17(2):53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sturm R. Tracking changes in behavioral health services: how have carve-outs changed care?The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1999;26(4):360–371.

    Google Scholar 

  7. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.National Medical Expenditure Survey 1987, Household Survey, Health Status Questionnaire and Access to Care Supplement. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research; 1992. Public use tape 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Care denied: US residents who are unable to obtain needed medical services.American Journal of Public Health. 1995;85(3):341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regier DA, Hirschfeld RM, Goodwin FK, et al. The NIMH Depression Awareness, Recognition, and Treatment Program: structure, aims, and scientific basis.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1988;145(11):1351–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics.National Health Interview Survey, 1994: Access to Care Supplement [computer file]. Hyattsville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics [producer]; 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berk ML, Schur CL, Cantor JC. Ability to obtain health care: recent estimates from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation National Access to Care Survey.Health Affairs. 1995;14(3):139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sturm R, Pacula RL. State mental health parity laws: cause or consequence of differences in use?Health Affairs. 1999;8(5):182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank RG, Koyanagi C, McGuire TG. The politics and economics of mental health parity laws.Health Affairs. 1997;16(4):108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sturm R, McCulloch J. Mental health and substance abuse benefits in carve-out plans and the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996.Journal of Health Care Finance. 1998;24(3):84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pacula RL, Sturm R. Mental health parity legislation: much ado about nothing?Health Services Research. 2000;35(1, pt 2):263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pacula RL, Sturm R. Employment-based mental health insurance in the year 2000: what has parity brought? Presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Health Services Research; June 2000; Los Angeles, CA.

  17. National Alliance for the Mentally Ill.State Mental Illness Parity Laws. Arlington, VA: National Alliance for the Mentally Ill; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wells KB, Sturm R, Sherbourne C, Meredith L.Caring for Depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sturm R, Gresenz C, Sherbourne CD, et al. The design of Health Care for Communities: a study of health care delivery for alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health conditions.Inquiry. 1999;36(2):221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the Community Tracking Study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people.Inquiry. 1996;33(2):195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sturm R, Unützer J. State legislation and the use of complementary and alternative medicine.Inquiry. Winter 2000–2001; 37(4).

  22. Stefl ME, Prosperi DC. Barriers to mental health service utilization.Community Mental Health Journal. 1985;21(3):167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Center for Disease Control.Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1998 Quality Control Report (1998). Available at: www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/brfss/ti-quality.htm. Accessed March 2000.

  24. Lantz PM, House JS, Lepkowski JM, et al. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors and mortality.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279(21):1703–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Katz SJ, Kessler RC, Frank RG, et al. The use of outpatient mental health services in the United States and Ontario: the impact of mental morbidity and perceived need for care.American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87(7):1136–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berk ML, Schur CL. Measuring access to care: improving information for policymakers.Health Affairs. 1998;17(1):180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sturm R, Sherbourne CD. Managed care and unmet need for mental health and substance abuse care in 1998.Psychiatric Services. 2000;51(2):177.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States: 1990–1997.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(18):1569–1575.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RAND, 1700 Main Street, 90407-2138, Santa Monica, CA

    Roland Sturm PhD (Senior Economist) & Cathy Donald Sherbourne PhD (Senior Health Policy Analyst)

Authors
  1. Roland Sturm PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cathy Donald Sherbourne PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Sturm PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sturm, R., Sherbourne, C.D. Are barriers to mental health and substance abuse care still rising?. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 81–88 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287236

Keywords

Search

Navigation