Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on holmes

“A critique of neo-progressive trends in Canadian education”,Interchange, 1971,2(3), 63–80

  • Exchange
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blalock, H. M., Jr.Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M., Jr. Path coefficients versus regression coefficients.American Journal of Sociology, 1967,72, 675–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. The objectives of sociology. In R. Bierstedt (Ed.),A design for sociology: Scope, objectives, and methods. (Monograph 9) Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. A new look at correlation analysis. In H. M. Blalock, Jr., & A. Blalock (Eds.),Methodology in social research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Pp.199–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredemeier, H. C. Schools and student growth.Urban Review, 1968,2(5), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. Peer cultures and education in modern society. In T. M. Newcombe & E. K. Wilson (Eds.),College peer groups. Chicago: Aldine, 1966. Pp. 244–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M., & Rokkan, S. (Eds.)Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R.Theory building. New York: Free Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. Path analysis: Sociological examples.American Journal of Sociology, 1966,72, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B.Socioeconomic background and occupational achievement: Extensions of a basic model. Washington, D.C.: Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., Haller, A., & Portes, A. Peer influences on aspirations: A reinterpretation.American Journal of Sociology, 1968,74, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Selvin, H. C.Delinquency research: An appraisal of analytic methods. New York: Free Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, D. E.The prediction of academic performance. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. Some observations on the papers by Carlos and Spady.Interchange, 1970,1 (3), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario. Dept. of Education.Living and learning. Report of the Provincial Committee on the Aims and Objectives of Education in the Schools of Ontario. Toronto: The Department, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler, D. S. Covariance analysis in sociological research. In E. F. Borgatta (Ed.),Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969, pp. 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatin, G. T. Ecological analysis of delinquency: Aggregation effects.American Sociological Review, 1969,34, 894–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. S., & Bachman, J. G. Structural versus individual effects.American Journal of Sociology, 1964,69, 585–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & Lev, J.Statistical inference. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E. The partitioning of variance on school effects studies: A reconsideration.American Educational Research Journal, 1970,7, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. The method of path coefficients.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1934,5, 161–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, L. Comments on holmes. Interchange 2, 92–100 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287085

Navigation